1887

Abstract

Summary

A significant number of problematic issues of water use in the territories controlled by Ukraine and in the territories occupied by Russia have manipulative and political components, and the treatment of the occupiers with the water infrastructure of Ukraine had one direction - to destroy and create humanitarian disasters. Only on examples with water supply facilities it becomes obvious that Russia is fighting not to seize vital resources, but to destroy them, not for the sake of the proclaimed “liberation” and “protection” of the population, but for the sake of its extermination or at least a significant deterioration in the conditions of its existence which does not fit into the classical definition of “water conflict”. That is, water in this case is not a trigger, even in the problem with Crimea. In open warfare, water bodies are used as weapons, while sources and technical means of water supply are sacrificed. In hybrid warfare, disinformation is used as a weapon. Therefore, the ability to independently analyze and resist disinformation on water issues is an important and indicative component of the professional training of hydrologists and hydrogeologists in a protracted war. In this study, modern politicized situations related to the use of water resources are typified. On the examples, a brief well-reasoned analysis is made, allowing a more objective look at the problem. More attention is paid to groundwater resources, since the hidden nature of their distribution provides more grounds for manipulation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520051
2023-11-07
2025-03-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/monitoring'2023/Mon23-051.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520051&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Diatel, O.O. (2019). Formation of water exchange and its forecasting in the conditions of technogenesis in the reclaimed territories of Volyn Polissya.Dissertation abstract (the technical sciences). Institute of Water Problems and Melioration NAAS of Ukraine, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hydro-political Interactions. Water Scarciti Atlas. URL: https://waterscarcityatlas.org/hydro-political-interactions/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gleick, P. (1993). Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security.International Security, 18(1), 79–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gökçekus, H., Bolouri, F. (2023). Transboundary Waters and Their Status in Today’s Water-Scarce World.Sustainability, 15, 4234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054234
    [Google Scholar]
  5. KamzistJ. S., ShevchenkoO.L. (2009). Hydrogeology of Ukraine. Kyiv, 614. (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Khilchevskyi, V.K., Grebin, V.V., Bolbot, H.V. (2022a). River basins districts of Ukraine –comparison with the map of Russia’s armed aggression (summer 2022).Proc. 16th International Scientific Conference: Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580017
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Khilchevskyi.V., Grebin.V., Dubniak.S. et al. (2022b). Large and small reservoirs of Ukraine.Journal of Water and Land Development, 52 (I–III), 101–107. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2022.140379
    https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2022.140379 [Google Scholar]
  8. Khilchevskyi, V.K., Mezentsev, K.V. (2021). Water conflicts and Ukraine: Donbas region. In Proc. 15th International Scientific Conference: Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20215K2004
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mianabadi, A., Davary, K., Mianabadi, H., Karimi, P. (2020). International environmental conflict management in transboundary river basins.Water Resour. Manag., 34, 3445–3464.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sindico, F. (2016). Transboundary Water Cooperation and the Sustainable Development; UNESCO: Paris, France, 45.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shams, A.K., Muhammad, N.S. (2022). Towards sustainable transboundary water cooperation between Afghanistan and Pakistan: Acase study of Kabul River.Ain Shams Eng. J., 14, 101842.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shumilova, O., Tockner, K., Sukhodolov, A. et al. (2023). Impact of the Russia–Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure.Nature Sustainability, 6, 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520051
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520051
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error