oa The Use of Gis and Remote Sensing Data for the Assessment of Ecosystem Services for Hydrological Cycle and Water Flow Regulation

References

1. ALOS Global Digital Surface Model (DSM) “ALOS World 3D-30m” (AW3D30) Ver.3.2/3.1 datasethttps://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/dataset/aw3d30/aw3d30_e.htm
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barth, N-C., Döll, P. (2016) Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach.Ecosystem Services, 21, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.012
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buchhorn, M, Smets, B, Bertels, L, De Roo, B., Lesiv, M., Tsendbazar, N-E., Herold, M., & Fritz, S. (2020). Copernicus Global Land Service: Land Cover 100m: collection 3: epoch 2019: Globe (V3.0.1) [Data set]. Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3939050
   [Google Scholar]
4. Crossman, N.D., Nedkov, S., Brander L. (2019) Discussion paper 7: Water flow regulation for mitigating river and coastal flooding.Paper submitted to the Expert Meeting on Advancing the Measurement of Ecosystem Services for Ecosystem Accounting, New York, January 22–24, 2019 and subsequently revised. Version of April 1, 2019. Available at: https://seea.un.org/events/expert-meeting-advancing-measurement-ecosystem-servicesecosystem-accounting.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davydchuk, V.S., Zarudna, R.F., Mikheli, S.V., Istomina, G.P., Sorokina, L.Yu. (2021) Collection of geographic maps with the description “Kyiv region. Landscape map” (in digital format, base scales 1:100,000, 1:200,000, 1:400,000)” (“Landscape map of Kyiv region”). Certificate of copyright registration for the work No. 104563. State Enterprise “Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute”. Date of registration: 14.05.2021.Copyright and related rights. Official Bulletin.65, 50–51. URL: https://ukrpatent.org/uk/articles/bulletin-copyright.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Farrugia, S., Hudson, M. D., McCulloch, L. (2013) An evaluation of flood control and urban cooling ecosystem services delivered by urban green infrastructure.International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 9, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2013.782342
   [Google Scholar]
7. Korohoda, N. (2022a) Assessment of the green spaces condition as potential opportunities to provide ecosystem services.Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Geografiya.3/4 (84/85), 34–38 DOI: 10.17721/1728‑2721.2022.85.1
   https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2022.85.1 [Google Scholar]
8. Korohoda, N. (2022b) The risk assessment of loss of erosion control ecosystem services in urban green spaces. Physical Geography and Geomorphology, 45 (111–116), 49–57. DOI:10.17721/phgg.2022.1‑6.06
   https://doi.org/10.17721/phgg.2022.1-6.06 [Google Scholar]
9. Korohoda, N., Halahan, O., & Kovtoniuk, O. (2022) The use of GIS and Remote Sensing Data in Determining the Condition of green spaces in Kyiv.In 16th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. 2022, November. 2022, 1, 1–5. EAGE Publications BV. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580056
   [Google Scholar]
10. KorohodaN., KupachT. (2023) Assessment of the volume of provision of cultural ecosystem services by Kyiv green zones.Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, series “Geology. Geography. Ecology”, 58, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2023-58-13
    [Google Scholar]
11. Vári, Á., Kozma, Z., Pataki, B. et al. (2022) Disentangling the ecosystem service ‘flood regulation’: Mechanisms and relevant ecosystem condition characteristics.Ambio, 51,1855–1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01708-0
    [Google Scholar]
12. Zanaga, D., Van De Kerchove, R., De Keersmaecker, W., Souverijns, N., Brockmann, C., Quast, R., Wevers, J., Grosu, A., Paccini, A., Vergnaud, S., Cartus, O., Santoro, M., Fritz, S., Georgieva, I., Lesiv, M., Carter, S., Herold, M., Li, Linlin, Tsendbazar, N.E., Ramoino, F., Arino, O. (2021) ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5571936
    [Google Scholar]