1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

The article considers the concept of the rock brittleness index, which has become widely used in the design of hydraulic fracturing. An analysis of the main approaches to its calculation is given - mineralogical, using elastic properties, using logging data. Within each of the approaches, the main methods of calculation are considered. For the mineralogical approach, this includes methods for rocks with different mineral composition. For the elastic approach, this includes methods using elastic moduli and mechanical parameters. For the logging approach, this includes empirical dependencies for individual formations. For a set of core samples of terrigenous rocks from the Dnipro-Donetsk basin, the mineralogical brittleness index using the main petrogenic components and the elastic brittleness index using Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio were determined. Conducting a comparative characterization of the results obtained with different methods showed the similarities in trends regarding lithology and petrophysical properties of rocks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520187
2023-11-07
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/monitoring'2023/Mon23-187.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520187&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Coates, D., and Parsons, R. (1966). Experimental Criteria for Classification of Rock Substances. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. &Geomech. Abstr.3 (3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.4095/300105
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodway, B. V., Varsek, J., and Abaco, C. (2006). Practical Application of P-Wave AVO for Unconventional Gas Resource Plays: Seismic Petrophysics and Isotropic AVO.The Recorder, 31, 90–95
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jarvie, D., Hill, R., Ruble, T., Pollastro, R. (2007). Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment.AAPG Bulletin - AAPG BULL, 91, 475–499. 10.1306/12190606068.
    https://doi.org/10.1306/12190606068 [Google Scholar]
  4. Jin, X., Shah, S., Roegiers, and J.-C., Zhang, B. (2014). Fracability Evaluation in Shale Reservoirs -An Integrated Petrophysics and Geomechanics Approach.SPE Journal, 20. 10.2118/168589‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/168589-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. Meng, F., Wong, L.N., & Zhou, H. (2020). Rock brittleness indices and their applications to different fields of rock engineering: A review.Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, 13, 221–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.06.008.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mews, KS, Alhubail, MM, Barati, RG. (2019). A Review of Brittleness Index Correlations for Unconventional Tight and Ultra-Tight Reservoirs.Geosciences, 9(7), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9070319
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Miskimins, J. (2019). Hydraulic fracturing: fundamentals and advancements Society of Petroleum Engineers
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rickman, R., Mullen, M. J., Petre, J. E. et al. (2008). A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, September 2008. https://doi.org/10.2118/115258-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, F.P., Gale, J.F. (2009) Screening criteria for shale-gas systems.Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 59, 779–793.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520187
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520187
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error