1887

Abstract

Summary

The seismic hazard department and department of seismic activity of Carpathian area of the Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine, with the support and collaboration of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Michigan State University (MSU), and the EarthScope Consortium (EarthScope) plan to expand the national seismic network through the installation of permanent broadband seismic stations in the territory of Ukraine. This is due to the fact that western, south-western and southern parts of Ukraine are located within the massive seismically active belt of the planet formed as a result of collision of Eurasian and African continental plates, spanning from the Azores via the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, and Caucasus and farther to Hindu Kush. This belt also includes the Carpathian Arc with major subcrustal earthquakes in Vrancea zone and the Crimean-Black Sea segment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520220
2023-11-07
2025-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2023/monitoring'2023/Mon23-220.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520220&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andruschenko, Y.., Liaschuk, O.., Farfuliak, L.., Amashukeli, T.., Haniiev, O.., Osadchyi, V.., Petrenko, K.., & Verbytskyi, S.. (2023). National seismological bulletin of Ukraine for 2021.Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 44(6), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v44i6.273649
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PetersonJ. (1993). Observations and modeling of seismic background noise.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. McNamaraD.E. and BulandR.P. (2004). Ambient Noise Levels in the Continental United States.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94/4, 1517–1527.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Main Center of Special Monitoring. (2010). Seismic Network Main Center of Special Monitoring [Data set]. International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks.https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/UD
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AmashukeliT., MalatestaL., FarfuliakL., HaniievO., PetrenkoK.Current issues and difficulties being faced by the Ukrainian seismic network.Seismological Society of America (SSA) Annual Meeting: Together We Advance Earthquake Science, 17–20 April 2023, San Juan, Puerto Rico. https://seismosoc.secure-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/31/details/9238
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Verbytskyi, S.T., & Verbytskyi, Yu.T. (2011). Current state and prospects of development studies seismological in the Carpathian region of Ukraine.Geodynamics, (2), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2011.02.035 (in Ukrainian).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Verbytskyi, S., Kuplovskyi, B., Prokopyshyn, V., Stetskiv, O., Nishchimenko, I., Brych, T., & Kruk, O. (2021). Evaluation of seismic shaking intensity gains by high frequency microseism registration method (as exemplified by a developable site in Uzhgorod).Geodynamics, 30(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2021.01.058
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520220
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023520220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error