1887

Abstract

Summary

Wavefield deconvolution of seabed seismic data presents a powerful method for attenuating multiple arrivals and removing the source signature from its output reflectivity. However, although Up/Down wavefield deconvolution is widely found to be useful in practice, the accuracy of the method degrades with dipping near surface reflectivity. Furthermore, extensions to deconvolution of the downgoing wavefield to access the improved illumination of mirror migration suffer practical problems where removal of the water wave is challenging (e.g. in shallow water). An alternative approach is therefore described, in which the deconvolution proceeds by annihilation of the downgoing wavefield to produce an estimate of the isolated water wave. The resultant reflectivity includes all events below the surface source array, and is positioned at two way time. Implementation of this Annihilation Filter Deconvolution (AFD) inside a 3D Source-side Multi-Dimensional Deconvolution (S-MDD) framework allows the S-AFMDD method to work well with sparse receivers and dense shots. This avoids the problem of aliasing across widely-spaced receiver lines that is suffered by the more standard receiver-side MDD. Results from a sparse OBC dataset in the Caspian Sea show good quality, dense, reflectivity and multiple models produced by the S-AFMDD with strongly dipping near surface reflectivity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023628014
2023-09-18
2025-11-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen, L. [2001] Elimination of free-surface related multiples without the need of the source wavelet.Geophysics, 66, 327–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boiero, D. and Bagaini, C. [2021] Up and Down Deconvolution in complex geological scenarios.Geophysics, 86, WC55–WC65, doi/10.1190/geo2020‑0926.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0926.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampson, G. and Szumksi, G. [2020] Down/down deconvolution.EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, doi https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202010603.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikelle, L. T. [1999] Combining two seismic experiments to attenuate free-surface multiples in OBC data.Geophysical Prospecting, 47, 179–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00125.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lokshtanov, D. [2000] Suppression of free-surface effects from multicomponent sea-floor data.62nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pica, A., Manin, M., Granger, P.Y., Marin, D., Suaudeau, E., David, B., Poulain, G. and Herrmann, P.H. [2006] 3D SRME on OBN data using waveform multiple modelling.SEG Expanded Abstracts, doi 10.1190/1.2370074.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2370074 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023628014
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2023628014
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error