A Closer Look at the Opportunities for Analogue Quantum Computing in Future Upstream HPC Applications

References

1. Ayanzadeh, R., Halem, M. and Finin, T. [2020] An ensemble approach for compressive sensing with quantum annealers. In: IGARSS 2020-2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 3517–3520.
   [Google Scholar]
2. van den Berg, E. and Friedlander, M.P. [2009] Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions.Siam journal on scientific computing, 31(2), 890–912.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Borle, A. and Lomonaco, S.J. [2022] How viable is quantum annealing for solving linear algebra problems?arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10576.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brooke, J., Bitko, D., Rosenbaum and Aeppli, G. [1999] Quantum annealing of a disordered magnet.Science, 284(5415), 779–781.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chancellor, N. [2019] Domain wall encoding of discrete variables for quantum annealing and QAOA.Quantum Science and Technology, 4(4), 045004.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dukalski, M., Oudejans, B. and Kontakis, A. [2023a] Practically feasible shortest path estimation with a quantum annealer (submitted). In: SEG/AAPG International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dukalski, M., Rovetta, D., van der Linde, S., Möller, M., Neumann, N. and Phillipson, F. [2023b] Quantum computer-assisted global optimization in geophysics illustrated with stack-power maximization for refraction residual statics estimation.Geophysics, 88(2), V75–V91.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Krauss, T. and McCollum, J. [2020] Solving the network shortest path problem on a quantum annealer.IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 1, 1–12.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ledoux, R. and Dukalski, M. [2023] Advantages of domain-wall encoded formulation of refraction residual statics estimation on a quantum annealer (submitted). In: SEG/AAPG International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy.
   [Google Scholar]
10. McGeoch, C., Farre, P. and Bernoudy, W. [2020] D-Wave hybrid solver service+ advantage: Technology update.D-Wave: The Quantum Computing Company, Tech. Rep.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mücke, S., Heese, R., Müller, S., Wolter, M. and Piatkowski, N. [2023] Feature selection on quantum computers.Quantum Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 11.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Nguyen, M.T., Liu, J.G., Wurtz, J., Lukin, M.D., Wang, S.T. and Pichler, H. [2023] Quantum optimization with arbitrary connectivity using Rydberg atom arrays.PRX Quantum, 4(1), 010316.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Raymond, J., Stevanovic, R., Bernoudy, W., Boothby, K., McGeoch, C.C., Berkley, A.J., Farré, P., Pasvolsky, J. and King, A.D. [2022] Hybrid quantum annealing for larger-than-QPU lattice-structured problems.ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Romano, Y., Primack, H., Vaknin, T., Meirzada, I., Karpas, I., Furman, D., Tradonsky, C. and Shlomi, R.B. [2022] Quantum Sparse Coding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03788.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rovetta, D., Dukalski, M. and Kontakis, A. [2023] Quantum annealer-assisted residual refraction statics estimation on the SEAM Arid model dataset. In: 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, 2023. 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
16. da Silva Coelho, W., Henriet, L. and Henry, L.P. [2023] A quantum pricing-based column generation framework for hard combinatorial problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02637.
    [Google Scholar]