1887

Abstract

Summary

Lineament mapping plays a major role in analysing structural deformation, and geologic boundaries, and inferring ground strength. Lineament analysis also provides crucial information about subsurface fractures that may be in direct link with hydrogeological interests. As lineaments are a reflection of subsurface occurrences brought about by various deformation processes, regions in the vicinity of lineaments and active faults are potentially weak zones for installing infrastructure thus necessitating its identification. ERI is based on the principle that different geological materials have distinct electrical resistivity values. By measuring the resistivity distribution of the subsurface, ERI allows for the visualization and characterization of lineaments. However, it’s important to take some precautions while taking readings and interpreting the data. The interpretation of resistivity data can be complex, as several factors can influence electrical conductivity, including porosity, moisture content, and mineral composition. Additionally, the resolution of ERI is influenced by factors such as electrode spacing, subsurface heterogeneity, and noise in the data. Careful data acquisition and processing are necessary to mitigate these challenges. To maximize the effectiveness of ERI for lineament mapping, it is often combined with other geophysical techniques or geological data sources. Integration with methods such as ground-penetrating radar (GPR), seismic surveys, or borehole data can provide complementary information, improving the accuracy and interpretation of lineament mapping results. As a result, Electrical Resistivity Imaging (ERI), a well-established, non-invasive geophysical method has been used at two different locations in the current study to locate potential lineaments. Eighteen profiles of 2D Electrical Resistivity Imaging were performed at the first location ‘M1’, along with fifteen profiles at the second location ‘M2’. Data acquisition has been done in two different types of electrode configurations namely Wenner and Wenner-Schlumberger array on natural ground with a constant electrode spacing of 5m. Data processing has been carried out using RES2DINV software. Resistivity results show anomalous zones at various locations in the profiles with very low resistivity values relative to the nearby value range. Electric Resistivity Imaging is used to get a picture of the internal resistivity distribution of the subsurface, understand the internal structure, etc. In the present work, the application of ERI for identifying lineament is discussed as it is essential, particularly during the design and construction stages, to ensure potential hazard mitigation

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202375048
2023-11-07
2025-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. [1]Hobbs, W. H. (1904). Lineaments of the Atlantic border region.Geological Society of America Bulletin, 15(1), 483–506.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Hobbs, W. H. (1912). Earth features and their meaning: an introduction to geology for the student and the general reader. The Macmillan Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Omosanya, K. O., Akinbodewa, A. E., & Mosuro, G. O. (2012). Integrated mapping of lineaments in Ago-Iwoye SE, SW Nigeria.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Norman, J. W., & Partridge, T. C. (1978). Fracture analysis in the determination of subunconformity structure: A photogeological study.Journal of Petroleum Geology, 1(1), 43–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Griffiths, D. H., & Barker, R. D. (1993). Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology.Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29(3), 211–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Loke, M. H., & Barker, R. D. (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method.Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]HamzahHussin et al.2017Effectiveness of 2-D Resistivity Survey to Identify Lineament (Fault) from Photolineament Interpretation – Case Study at Kampung Dato’ Mufti, Ampang, Selangor DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17171.78888.
    https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17171.78888 [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202375048
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202375048
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error