1887

Abstract

Summary

This presentation reviews some challenges and recent progress in predicting fault properties and fluid-flow behaviour in shale-rich sequences. Fluid flow behaviour of fault zones is controlled by their structure, including potentially core and damage zones. Building on an understanding of the factors controlling such fault zone internal structure, achieved from outcrop studies, prediction of these structures and influence on subsurface flow relies on knowledge of composition and geological history of topseals which together impact mechanical behaviour at the time of faulting.

Quantification of fault permeability and hydraulic behaviour comes partly from laboratory measurements of samples from analogue fault zones, pressure measurements in wells around faults, and in-situ well tests dedicated to measuring fault behaviour.

A challenge of societal importance is understanding hydro-mechanical behaviour of faults when subjected to anthropogenic stress or pore pressure, with respect to reactivation, seismicity, and leakage. Current work is presented on predicting, from geological history, the generation of dilatant and / or compactant structures susceptible to enhance the conduit or sealing behaviour of a fault zone, and pressure data from wells around active faults used to better understand fluid retention and fault shear limits, concluding with perspectives to further our understanding of fault hydro-mechanical behaviour.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101042
2024-06-10
2025-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bastien, W., Geraud, Y., Hautevelle, Y., Diraison, M. and Raisson, F. [2019]. Fluid circulations at structural intersections through the Toro-Bunyoro fault system (Albertine Rift, Uganda): A multidisciplinary study of a composite hydrogeological system.Geofluids, 25, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8161469
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chavagnac, P., Lays, P. and Tenepalli, S. [2013]. Hydrocarbon migration and trapping mechanisms in Lake Albert Basin, Uganda.12th PESGB/HGS Conference on Africa E&P, London, U.K.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Couzens-Schultz, B.A., Chan, A.W. [2010]. Stress determination in active thrust belts: An alternative leak-off pressure interpretation.Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 1061–1069.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Donze, F.V., Tsopela, A., Guglielmi, Y., Henry, P., Gout, C. [2020]. Fluid migration in faulted shale rocks : channelling below the active faulting threshold.European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1765200
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaarenstroom, L., Tromp, R.A.J., De Jong, M.C., Brandenburg, A.M. [1993]. Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety. In Parker, J.R. (Ed.), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proc. 4th Conference, Geological Society, London, 2, p. 1305–1313.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mildren, S.D., Hillis, R.R., Kaldi, J. [2002]. Calibrating predictions of fault seal reactivation in the Timor Sea.Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association Journal, v. 42, p. 187–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sibson, R. [1977]. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms.Journal of the Geological Society of London, 133, 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.133.3.0191
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wibberley, C.A.J. [2019]. Fault leakage rates estimated in-situ: implications for fault seal evaluation.5th EAGE conference on Fault & Topseals, Palermo, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101042
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error