1887

Abstract

Summary

With the urgent need to reduce CO2 emissions, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies have become crucial. Shale gas formations offer a promising solution for storing CO2, but interactions between CO2 and shale can affect shale properties during storage and recovery processes. This study delves into how shale absorbs Carbon Dioxide, considering factors like total organic carbon (TOC), temperature, and clay mineralogy. Using machine learning, a new approach in this field, we predict CO2 adsorption on shale surfaces using supervised techniques. The Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR) is the most effective model, accurately predicting CO2 adsorption, validated with extensive experimental data. Spearman’s correlation analysis reveals important connections between input factors and CO2 adsorption, highlighting the significance of specific surface area (SSA) and TOC with a significant clay mineral percentage. The models’ robustness is confirmed by Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Average Absolute Percentage Error (AAPE) values, with GBR showing high reliability. This research introduces an innovative machine-learning framework for precise CO2 adsorption predictions on shale surfaces, enhancing accuracy in gas adsorption estimation across different operational scenarios.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101402
2024-06-10
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alanazi, A., Ibrahim, A. F., Bawazer, S., Elkatatny, S., & Hoteit, H.2023. Machine learning framework for estimating CO2 adsorption on coalbed for carbon capture, utilization, and storage applications. International Journal of Coal Geology, 275, 104297.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fatah, A., Bennour, Z., Mahmud, H. B., Gholami, R., & Hossain, M.2020. A Review on the Influence of CO2/Shale Interaction on Shale Properties: Implications of CCS in Shales. Energies, 13, 3200.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta, N., Verma, A.2023. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Utilization for Hydraulic Fracturing of Shale Reservoir, and Geo-Storage: A Review. Energy & Fuels, 37, 14604–14621.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lyu, Q., Tan, J., Li, L., Ju, Y., Busch, A., Wood, D. A., Ranjith, P., Middleton, R. S., Shu, B., Hu, C., Wang, Z., & Hu, R.2021. The role of supercritical carbon dioxide for recovery of shale gas and sequestration in gas shale reservoirs. Energy and Environmental Science. 14, 4203–4227.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Memon, A., Li, A., Memon, B. S., Muther, T., Han, W., Kashif, M., Tahir, M. U., & Alam, I.2020. Gas Adsorption and Controlling Factors of Shale: Review, Application, Comparison and Challenges. Natural Resources Research. 30, 827–848.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Murugesu, M. P., Joewondo, N., & Prasad, M.2023. Carbon storage capacity of shale formations: Mineral control on CO2 adsorption. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 124, 103833.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Xie, W., Xie, W., Vandeginste, V., Chen, S., Yu, Z., Wang, J., Wang, H., & Gan, H.2022. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of CO2 in the Longmaxi shale gas reservoir. RSC Advances, 12, 25947–25954.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101402
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101402
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error