1887

Abstract

Summary

This study explores pathways to leverage potential opportunities to deploy hydrogen co-firing and draw a roadmap for the power plant to produce hydrogen while increasing use of renewables and reducing carbon emissions to achieve decarbonization of this sector. For this, a thorough techno-commercial assessment framework for co-firing hydrogen in gas power plants to reduce carbon emission is developed supported by energy transition strategy, process engineering modeling, flow simulation, and economics modeling to connect the different components involved in the studied hydrogen value chain. The conclusions drawn from the study show that: (i) to meet these objectives will require a full integration of multiple technologies packaged into a viable hydrogen value chain to deliver the required hydrogen volume; (ii) the hydrogen co-firing in the studied gas power plants will only contribute to a portion of the CO2 emission targets; (iii) a further reduction to meet the net zero target will be achieved by introducing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies combined with the development of multiple renewable energy projects, such as large-scale solar projects. Finally, this study strongly confirms that technologies developed for oil and gas can easily be adapted to energy transition strategies for hydrogen for power generation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101567
2024-06-10
2026-03-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acar, C. and Dincer, I. [2022]. Selection criteria and ranking for sustainable hydrogen production options, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47 (95), 40118–40137.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. International Energy Agency. [2023]. Hydrogen. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/low-emission-fuels/hydrogen
  3. Abdul-Qyyum, M., Dickson, R., Ali Shah, S. F., Niaz, H., Khan, A., J.Jay Liu, J., and Lee, M. [2021]. Availability, versatility, and viability of feedstocks for hydrogen production: Product space perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Oni, A.O., Anaya, K., Giwa, T., Di Lullo, G., and Kumar, A. [2022]. Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions. Energy Conversion and Management, 254.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Vaccarelli, M., Carapellucci, R., and Giordano, L. [2014]. Energy and Economic Analysis of the CO2 Capture from Flue Gas of Combined Cycle Power Plants. Energy Procedia, 45, 1165–1174.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101567
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024101567
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error