Synthetic Data in Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunities

References

1. Caté, A., Perozzi, L., Gloaguen, E. & Blouin, M.Machine learning as a tool for geologists. Lead. Edge36, 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36030215.1 (2017).
   [Google Scholar]
2. De Lima, R. P., Duarte, D., Nicholson, C., Slatt, R. & Marfurt, K. J.Petrographic microfacies classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Comput. Geosci.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104481 (2020).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Goodfellow, I. J. et al.Generative adversarial networks. Proc. 27th Int. Conf. on Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2, 2672–2680 (2014).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ferreira, I., Ochoa, L., & Koeshidayatullah, A. (2022). On the generation of realistic synthetic petrographic datasets using a style-based GAN. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16034-4
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dramsch, J. S.70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review. Adv. Geophys. 61, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2020.08.002 (2020).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ferreira-Chacua, I., & Koeshidayatullah, A. I. (2023). ForamViT-GAN: Exploring New Paradigms in Deep Learning for Micropaleontological Image Analysis. IEEE Access, 11, 67298–67307.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B. & Hochreiter, S.Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.08500 (2017).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B. & Hochreiter, S.Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.08500 (2017).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Koh, E., Eiman, A., Geoffrey, M. & Nick, B.Utilising convolutional neural networks to perform fast automated modal mineralogy analysis for thin-section optical microscopy. Miner. Eng.173, 107230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021 (2021).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Karras, T., Laine, S. & Aila, T.A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1812.04948 (2018).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Karras, T. et al.Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1812.04948 (2019).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Karras, T. et al.Training generative adversarial networks with limited data. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2006.06676 (2020).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Tritrong, N., Rewatbowornwong, P., & Suwajanakorn, S. (2021). Repurposing GANs for One-shot Semantic Part Segmentation. ArXiv, preprint(2103.04379v5). http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.04379
    [Google Scholar]
14. Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M., & Luo, P. (2021). SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.15203
    [Google Scholar]