1887

Abstract

Summary

For geothermal exploration, the ability to detect temperature gradients and heat sources underground is crucial. The pulsed EM technology is capable of detecting differences in rock types and the presence of fluids, which are important indicators of potential geothermal resources. In the context of finding geothermal heat, the pulsed EM technology has been trained to measure heat directly. It can aid in identifying key geological structures associated with geothermal activity, such as volcanic rocks or fault zones that might channel hot fluids. This information can be useful for inferring areas with potential geothermal activity. The technique shows great potential as a digital predrilling method for complementing direct geothermal exploration methods such as temperature gradient drilling or geothermal well logging.

In this article we present a noninvasive method for the remote monitoring of subsurface temperature using low frequency EM pulses. Conventional ground penetrating EM [ ] has limited applications for subsurface measurements in oil fields due to electromagnetic losses, which are rather high in the commonly used frequency range of 50 to 1000MHz, resulting in a rather shallow exploration depth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202421017
2024-11-04
2026-03-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. •Angelopoulos, M. C., W. H.Pollard, and N. J.Couture, 2013, The application of ccr and gpr to characterize ground ice conditions at parsons lake, northwest territories: Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85, 22–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. •Berthelier, J. J., S.Bonaime, V.Ciarletti, R.Clairquin, F.Dolon, A. L.Gall, D.Nevejans, R.Ney, and A.Reineix, 2005, Initial results of the Netlander imaging ground-penetrating radar operated on the Antarctic Ice Shelf: GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 32, L22305, doi:10.1029/2005GL024203.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024203 [Google Scholar]
  3. •Goodfellow, I., Y.Bengio, and A.Courville, 2016, Deep Learning: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. •Jol, H. M., 2009, Ground penetrating radar theory and applications: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. •Kummerow, J., and S.Raab, 2015, Temperature Dependence of Electrical Resistivity — Part II: A New Experimental Set-up to Study Fluid-saturated Rocks: Energy Procedia, 76, 247–255.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. •Mather, P. M., and M.Koch, 2011, Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. •Stove, G., G. C.Stove, and M.Robinson, 2018, New method for monitoring steam injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and for finding sources of geothermal heat: Presented at the Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. •Stove, G., and K.van den Doel, 2015, Large depth exploration using pulsed radar: ASEG-PESA Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, Perth, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. •Stove et al., 2023, Deep detection range test for a low frequency subsurface radar system (with reviewable data available online), 84th EAGE Annual Conference & ExhibitionJun 2023, Volume 2023, p.1 – 5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023101348
    [Google Scholar]
  10. •van den Doel, K., J.Jansen, M.Robinson, G. C.Stove, and G. D. C.Stove, 2014, Ground penetrating abilities of broadband pulsed radar in the 1-70MHz range: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014, Denver, 1770–1774.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202421017
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202421017
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error