1887

Abstract

Summary

Numerical models can be considered to predict the response of CO2 storage sites to various injection scenarios and help to estimate their potential and identify optimal exploitation schemes. For these models to be representative of the considered storage and provide reliable predictions, their input parameters must be characterized using the available data. However, these data are generally not informative enough to determine unique values for these properties, resulting in uncertainties on the predicted dynamics that must be considered for robust decisions. This generally requires to perform many time-consuming flow simulations. These computation times can however be reduced by replacing simulations with calls to meta-models that approximate the relationship between the simulator inputs and outputs and provide fast estimations of these outputs.

In practice, the number of parameters to be considered as inputs to these meta-models can be large, inducing the need for many simulations in the training set to obtain accurate estimations. A preliminary screening of these parameters can help to discard the ones that have a negligible influence on the outputs of interest, thus reducing the complexity of the meta-modeling process. We propose here to investigate the potential of a new screening technique based on the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC), which proved to be efficient in other applications. This sensitivity approach relies on cross-covariance operators between the input parameters and outputs probability distributions to detect dependencies. The resulting sensitivity indices can be estimated from a limited sample of simulations, and statistical tests can be performed to separate significant parameters from non-significant ones. In addition, this approach makes it possible to compute some global sensitivity indices for temporal or spatial outputs. Finally, the samples used to compute the sensitivity indices can be designed to be re-used for the meta-modeling training step, considering for instance space-filling designs such as Latin Hypercube sampling.

We propose here to study the potential of this approach in the context of CO2 storage, considering the simulation of CO2 injection in a synthetic radial saline aquifer with and without salting-out effect. More precisely, the HSIC indices are computed from samples of varying sizes, and Gaussian process-based predictors are built considering as inputs the parameters identified as influential from the statistical tests. The studied input parameters include physical and geological characteristics as well as operational constraints. Outputs include temporal and spatial simulated properties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202437072
2024-09-02
2025-11-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1.Da Veiga, S. (2015). Global sensitivity analysis with dependence measures.Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(7), 1283–1305.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.De Lozzo, M., Marrel, A. (2016) New improvements in the use of dependence measures for sensitivity analysis and screening. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 86(15), 3038–3058.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.El Amri, R., Marrel, A. (2022). Optimized HSIC-based tests for sensitivity analysis: application to thermalhydraulic simulation of accidental scenario on nuclear reactor.Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(3), 1386–1403.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.Estublier, A., Bachaud, P., Michel, A., Maurand, N., & Deflandre, J. P. (2014). Long-term fate of CO2 in a saline aquifer: modeling issues.Energy Procedia, 63, 3464–3474.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.Gassara, O., Estublier, A., Garcia, B., Noirez, S., Cerepi, A., Loisy, C., ... & Thomas, B. (2021). The Aquifer-CO2Leak project: Numerical modeling for the design of a CO2 injection experiment in the saturated zone of the Saint-Emilion (France) site.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 104, 103196.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.Iooss, B. et al. (2024) R Package Sensitivity : Global sensitivity analysis of models outputs and importance measures.https://cran.r-project.org/package=sensitivity
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.Iooss, B., Marrel, A. (2019) Advanced Methodology for Uncertainty Propagation in Computer Experiments with Large Number of Inputs.Nuclear Technology, 205(12), 1588–1606.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.Le Gallo, Y., Trenty, L., Michel, A., Vidal-Gilbert, S., Parra, T., & Jeannin, L. (2006). Long-term flow simulations of CO2 storage in saline aquifer. In Proceedings of the GHGT8 conference-Trondheim (Norway), 18–22
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.Matérn, B. (1986) Spatial Variation.Springer, New York
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.Morris, M. D. (1991). Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments.Technometrics, 33(2), 161–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., Deville, Y. (2012) Dicekriging, DiceOptim: two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based meta-modeling and optimization.J. Stat. Softw.51(1), 1–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., Wynn, H.P. (1989). Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments.Statist. Sci., 4, 409–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., Notz, W. (2003) The design and analysis of computer experiments.Springer-Verlab, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202437072
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202437072
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error