1887

Abstract

Summary

The East Nile Delta offshore Egypt has been a challenging area for seismic imaging due to the presence of substantial velocity heterogeneity resulting from a variable Messinian and complex fault structures. Conventional towed streamer has been pushed to its technical limit, but the imaging is still not sufficient for adequate representation of the subsurface. Improving seismic resolution has been a continued focus area since more seismic detail can provide valuable insights about the subsurface. Previous studies and knowledge gained through projects in other regions suggest that a step change in improvement of resolution can be achieved through improved acquisition, a better velocity model, improved signal to noise (S/N), boosting the high frequencies and improved imaging algorithms. The Atoll field was highlighted as a candidate to benefit from improved seismic resolution due to its geological complexity and value to the business. Results show that having an OBN acquisition allowed for improved spatial sampling and higher resolution. Acquiring offsets in excess of 24km contributed to robust high frequency velocity models capturing the subsurface in fine detail. Careful pre-processing with a focus on removing noise and multiples whilst preserving true amplitude reflectors have contributed to incremental improvements which turned out to be significant when combined.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024632043
2024-02-26
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bancroft, J., Guirigay, T., Isaac, H., and Saeed, N. [2015]. Processing seismic data for high spatial resolution.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 4201–4205. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5932503.1
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, H., Zarkhidze, A., Duhoon, N., and Caprioli, P. [2017]. 3D multicable adaptive interpolation and deghosting: Optimum broadband solutions for wide-azimuth and full-azimuth acquisition.87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4871–4875. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17746887.1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Páramo, P., Vincent, K., Cardinez, S., and Hodgson, L. [2018]. Combining 3D HR and OBC datasets to increase bandwidth, signal-to-noise and resolution.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2747–2751. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2987768.1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shao, G., Zhuang, D., Huang, R., Wang, P., Nolte, B., Paramo, P., and Vincent, K. [2017]. Least-squares Q migration: The path to improved seismic resolution and amplitude fidelity.SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 6093. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17742644.1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wei, Z., Mei, J., Wu, Z., Zhang, Z., Huang, R., and Wang, P. [2023]. Pushing seismic resolution to the limit with FWI imaging.The Leading Edge, 42: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle42010024.1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Xu, L., Yang, J., Chen, H., Vu, M., and Wang, P. [2015]. Application of 3D source deghosting and designature to deep-water ocean bottom node data.85th Annual International meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4631–4635. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5924634.1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024632043
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2024632043
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error