1887

Abstract

Summary

The study was done during the 2023 GRÓ GTP programme in Iceland. The purpose of this study is to implement and apply automatic detection of earthquakes using the QuakeMigrate package. Detection and location parameters were calculated for a test seismic database from Iceland. We have used the 1D NonLinLoc Grid2Time Eikonal solver method to determine travel time in the study grid of 28x32 km. Several parameters were determined for automatic detection of earthquakes. The marginal window parameter was set to 1 s and the minimum event interval was set to 6 s. STA/LTA parameters were set to 1 and 10 s in the detection stage. But these parameters were set as 0.1 and 6 s to detailed determination of seismic phases. A total of 1300 earthquakes were determined in the study grid of the Hengill area. Seismic phase picking errors were between 0,066 and 1 s.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
2024-05-13
2026-02-06

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Artman, B. P. (2010). Source location using time-reverse imaging.Geophysical Prospecting, 58(5), 861–873.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer, M. &. (1987). An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events.Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 77, 1437–1445.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Gajewski, D. &. (2005). Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization.Geophysical Journal International, 163(1).
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Grigoli, F. C. (2014). Automated seismic event location by waveform coherence analysis.Geophysical Journal International, 196(3), 1742–1753.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Hudson, T. S. (2019). Automated detection of basal icequakes and discrimination from surface crevassing.Annals of Glaciology, 60(79), 167–181.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Jakobsdóttir, S. S. (2008). Seismicity in Iceland: 1994–2007.Jökull, 58(1), 75–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Langet, N. M. (2014). Continuous kurtosis-based migration for seismic event detection and location, with application to Piton de la Fournaise Volcano. La Reunion.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Larmat, C. T.-P. (2008). Time reversal location of glacial earthquakes.Journal of Geophysical Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, L. T. (2020). Recent advances and challenges of waveform-based seismic location methods at multiple scales.Reviews of Geophysics58(1), DOI 10.1029/2019RG0.
     https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG0 [Google Scholar]
  10. McMechan, G. A. (1982). Determination of source parameters by wavefield extrapolation.Geophysical Journal International, 71(4).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Trnkoczy, A. (2009). Understanding and parameter setting of STA/LTA trigger algorithm. In P. Bormann, New manual of seismological observatory practice (NMSOP) (pp. 1–20). Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ,.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, T. (2014). Time-reverse modelling of acoustic wave propagation in attenuating media.Geophysical Journal International, 197(1).
     [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
Loading
Application of QuakeMigrate to Automatically Detect and Pick Earthquake Phases
Conference Proceedings 2024, 1 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202472089
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error