1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Monitoring strategies for offshore CCS cannot simply replicate those used in the oil and gas industry. Regulations mandate monitoring throughout the project’s entire lifespan, including decades post-closure. CCS calls for cost-effective solutions, making expensive high-resolution methods like seismic less viable. Moreover, environmental regulations pose challenges to the intensive use of seismic methods, that feature large CO2 footprints and active sources. Operationally, the presence of infrastructure like wind farms, hinders the systematic surveying patterns required for seismic monitoring. Last but not least, 4D seismic signal detectability can be low when CO2 is injected into depleted gas reservoirs due to the weak contrast with the preexisting residual gas. Time-lapse gravity and seafloor deformation monitoring is a mature commercial technology used for 25 years in Norway to fully replace or complement 4D seismic in gas-producing reservoirs. Recent modeling for CCS projects like Morecambe in the UK demonstrates very significant and robust time-lapse gravity signals after one year of injection, indicating an excellent capability to delineate both the CO2 and the pressure plumes. This offers a viable path forward for monitoring CO2 storage sites sustainably and cost-effectively, while overcoming the operational limitations of 4D seismic. This can be crucial for the long-term success and economic viability of CCS projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474005
2024-08-12
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2024/3rd-eage-conference-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/0005.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474005&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Borges, F., Basford1, H., Calder, T., Lien, M., Vassvåg, S., Ward, C. (2024). Monitoring CO2 Storage in the Morecambe Depleted Gas Reservoirs through Seafloor Deformation and Time-Lapse Gravimetry Measurements. First Break, 42(3), 71 – 75
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrington, S., Pezzoli, M., Paydayesh, M., Ward, C., Danchenko, D., Fletcher, A., Ackers, M. (2023). Quantifying the Predicted Seismic and EM response of CO2 injection into a depleted gas reservoir. The fourth EAGE Global Energy Transition Conf. and Exhib., Nov 2023, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ruiz, H., Lien, M., Vatshelle, M., Alnes, H., Haverl, M., and Sørensen, H. (2022). Monitoring the Snøhvit gas field using seabed gravimetry and subsidence. First Break, 40(3), 93–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Solbu, Ø. H., Nyvoll, A., Alnes, H., Vassvåg, S., Lien, M., and Ruiz, H. (2023). Time-Lapse Gravity and Subsidence Applied in History Matching of a Gas-Condensate Field. First Break, 41(9), 69–74.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474005
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error