1887

Abstract

Summary

Petrophysical interpretation and modelling plays a key role in assessing storage capacity, injectivity, sealing capacity and ongoing conformance monitoring for a CCS project. To understand any impact the introduction of pure CO2 saturated brine might have on the Angel storage formation petrophysical properties, 20 core plug samples capturing the range of petrophysical property groups representing the Angel storage formation underwent baseline petrophysical measurements. The plugs after static ageing in CO2 saturated brine for 20 and 40-days at in-situ reservoir conditions were re-tested and reimaged to evaluate the impact of static fluid-rock interactions on the petrophysical properties.

The results showed negligeable changes to porosity and a varying increase in permeability. Generally greater increases in permeability were associated with higher permeability samples. SEM images show evidence of pore throat scale microstructural differences and dissolution of reactive dolomitic cement. The study showed that no impairment to the Angel storage formation in place volume capacity would be expected with the introduction and long-term storage of CO2 at the planned injection site within the aquifer. Small scale improvement in permeability could occur at the injection site although this is not expected to propagate far into the formation during injection of CO2.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474018
2024-08-12
2025-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ringrose, P. [2023] Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Saline Aquifers: Building confidence by forecasting and monitoring. 2023 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Distinguished Instructor Series No. 26, Houston.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. API [1998] Recommended Practices for Core AnalysisFeb 1998 API40.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Core Laboratories CMS 300 Manual – Theory of Operation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Juhasz, I. [1998] Porosity Systems and Petrophysical Models Used in Formation Evaluation. 1998 SPWLA London Chapter Porosity Seminar.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Worthington, A. E., Hedges, J. H., Pallatt, N. [1990] SCA Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Porosity Measurement of Electrical Resistivity Samples. Feb 1990 The Log Analyst.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474018
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error