1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

During the initiation stages of CO2 storage projects, predicting the ultimate plume distribution presents a significant challenge due to the presence of substantial uncertainties in subsurface conditions. These uncertainties, when predicting plume distribution, need to be handled in a consistent way to better assess risks related to containment and to ultimately determine a storage site as having a low risk profile. This paper summarizes a method that utilizes ensemble-based approaches to create a range of realizations that represent uncertainty from the outset, to characterize uncertainties in static geomodels. A dynamic simulation is performed on each of these geomodel realizations using a modified invasion percolation simulator to improve model runtimes and deliver accurate representations of plume migration. The simulation outcomes are compared to known plume distributions to assess conceptual leakage risks. What we discovered was that even in a highly studied storage site with relatively low heterogeneity, our predictions remain highly sensitive to uncertainties. This underscores the need for robust assessment methods when evaluating new targets, regardless of how much we may think we already know.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474019
2024-08-12
2026-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2024/3rd-eage-conference-on-carbon-capture-and-storage/0019.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474019&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cavanagh, A. [2013]. Benchmark calibration and prediction of the Sleipner CO2 plume from 2006 to 2012. Energy Procedia; 37, 3529–3545.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Emerick, A. A., and Reynolds, A. C. [2013]. History-Matching Production and Seismic Data in a Real Field Case Using the Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. SPE 163675.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh, V., Cavanagh, A. J., Hansen, H., Nazarian, B., Iding, M., and Ringrose, P. [2010]. Reservoir Modeling of CO2 Plume Behavior Calibrated Against Monitoring Data from Sleipner, Norway. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, September 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Skorstad, A., and Ducroux, S. [2023] Honouring Uncertainties in CO2 Storage Assessments – Preventing Overconfidence. EAGE Workshop on Unlocking Carbon Capture and Storage Potential. 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474019
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202474019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error