1887

Abstract

Summary

Fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) applied to microseismic has gained popularity in various microseismic monitoring applications. Compared to conventional geophone array based microseismic monitoring, DAS microseimsic has unique advantages in minimizing location uncertainties. However, if only one straight fiber were deployed on surface or in downhole, DAS may not be able to uniquely determine a microseismic event location without other constraints due to circular event location ambiguities. Since a standard DAS fiber cable usually can only record one component seismic wave data which is not able to provide source direction to reduce the circular ambiguities in event location, we developed a innovative joint DAS and 3C geophone array for microseismic monitoring and a three-step microseismic event location workflow to obtain a unique event location. First, we calculate source direction using P-wave first arrival on 3C geophone. Second, we calculate 2D semblance image along the source-geophone direction. Third, we extract the location of maximum semblance value in 2D semblance image as the event location. We presented a microseismic event location example which was obtained by applying the three-step location workflow on microseismic event dataset acquired by a field survey with joint DAS and 3C geophone array.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202475019
2024-08-14
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Han, L., Wong, J., Bancroft, J.C., 2009, Hypocenter location using hodogram analysis of noisy 3c microseismograms: In Consortium for Research in Elastic Wave Exploration Seismology (CREWES) Research Report, p. 29.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Karrenbach, M., S.Cole, A.Ridge, K.Boone, D.Kahn, J.Rich, K.Silver, and D.Langton, 2019, Fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing of microseismicity, strain and temperature during hydraulic fracturing: Geophysics, 84, D11–D23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Staněk, F., D.Anikiev, J.Valenta, and L.Eisner, 2015, Semblance for microseismic event detection: Geophysical Journal International,201.1362–1369.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lellouch, A., Lindsey, N. J., Ellsworth, W. L., & Biondi, B. L., 2020, Comparison between distributed acoustic sensing and geophones: Downhole microseismic monitoring of the FORGE geothermal experiment. Seismological Society of America, 91(6), 3256–3268.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, C., and Luo, Y., 2023, Joint DAS and Geophone Microseismic Imaging, 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Vol. 2023. No. 1. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202475019
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202475019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error