1887

Abstract

Summary

This study focuses on automating the creation of Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) sensitivity matrices using machine learning (ML) to improve seismic exploration. Traditional methods are labor-intensive and prone to inaccuracies due to manual processes and expert interpretation. We developed a Random Forest model to estimate Bulk Density (RHOB), Compressional Velocity (VP), and Shear Velocity (VS) in the Balingian area, Offshore Sarawak.

Our model integrated well log data and employed sequential prediction for enhanced accuracy. Data preprocessing involved removing outliers and bad data points. Key features included gamma ray, bulk density, and seismic velocities. Hyperparameter tuning via Grid Search with cross-validation ensured optimal performance.

Results showed the model performed well under simpler fluid conditions (INSITU and BRINE) but struggled with complex conditions (OIL and GAS), as indicated by higher error rates and negative R-squared (R2) values. Metrics such as Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) highlighted these challenges.

This study demonstrates ML’s potential to automate and improve seismic velocity predictions, aiding petrophysics in subsurface understanding and drilling target identification. Further refinement and additional data are necessary to enhance predictive accuracy for complex fluid scenarios, paving the way for more efficient and accurate seismic exploration processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477015
2024-10-15
2026-02-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BosungLim, HuieunYu, DaeungYoon, Myung JinNam (2021). Machine learning derived AVO analysis on marine 3D seismic data over gas reservoirs near South Korea. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Volume 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108105
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Castagna, J.P., & Backus, M.M. (1993). Offset-Dependent Reflectivity: Theory and Practice of AVO Analysis. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DhananjayKumar (2023). Chapter Nine - Seismic AVO analysis for reservoir characterization. Developments in Structural Geology and Tectonics. Elsevier 6:259–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99593-1.00002-1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kumar, S. (2023). Advances in Seismic Data Processing. Journal of Geophysical Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. R. T.Shuey (1985). A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. GEOPHYSICS50: 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441936
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith, G.C., & Gidlow, P.M. (1987). Weighted Stacking for Rock Property Estimation and Detection of Gas. Geophysics, 52(5), 803–807.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ZhiqiGuo, XiaoyingQin, and CaiLiu (2023). Pore and Microfracture Characterization in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs with a New Rock-Physics-Based Seismic Attribute. Remote Sensing15, no. 2: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020289
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477015
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error