1887

Abstract

Summary

Reservoir fluid samples offer key information for subsurface engineers to determine the hydrocarbon in place and make a plan of field development with better reservoir management, especially for complex fluids with contaminants. It also helps surface facilities engineers design production facilities, evaluate flow assurance, asset integrity, contaminants analyses, product sales value, and most importantly health, safety, and environment. Therefore, early identification of contaminants and flow assurance issues are required to achieve efficiency in the management of reservoir fluids in oil and gas production. This paper proposes a methodology based on thermodynamic modeling analysis and a novel quality check method to identify the contaminants and flow assurance issues as early as possible.

The increasing complexity of hydrocarbon fluids requires comprehensive phase behavior analysis to identify potential issues due to the presence of complex fluid mixtures and contaminants. The approach integrates thermodynamic principles, quality checks laboratory data using novel methods, and advanced analytical techniques through PVT fluid characterization to predict and assess the behavior of complex reservoir fluids.

The results demonstrate the ability of thermodynamic modeling analysis in the early identification of contaminants and flow assurance challenges. The methodology enables proactive decision-making, optimizing production operations, and reducing downtime associated with contaminant issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477110
2024-11-20
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hendraningrat, L., & Salleh, I.K. [2021] Applied Novel Quality Check Method for PVT Data with High Impurities Using Various Samples from Malaysian Fields. Paper SPE-207220-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hendraningrat, L., & Shafian, S.R.M. [2024] Flow Assurance Analysis of Complex Fluid Mixtures: A Case Study Field in Southeast Asia. Paper IPTC-23412-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumar, A. [2023] Perspectives of flow assurance problems in oil and gas production: a mini review. Energy & Fuels, 37(12), 8142–8159.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Melchuna, A., Zhang, X., Sa, J., Abadie, E., Glenat, P., & Sum, A. [2020] flow risk index: a new metric for solid precipitation assessment in flow assurance management applied to gas hydrate transportability. Energy & Fuels, 34(8), 9371–9378.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nwosu, O., Daodu, O., Ogbunude, B., Emelle, C, Nnanna, E., and Emesi, J. [2022] Prediction and Prevention of Wax Deposition in MERO-006T: A Thermodynamic Modelling Approach. Paper SPE-211943-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oliveira, M. and Gonçalves, M. A. L. [2012] An effort to establish correlations between brazilian crude oils properties and flow assurance related issues. Energy & Fuels, 26(9), 5689–5701.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma, M. M. [2006] Formation Damage. In Clegg, J. D. (editor) Production Operations Engineering (Volume IV). Society of Petroleum Engineers. 241–274.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477110
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477110
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error