1887

Abstract

Summary

The evolution and facies distribution of relatively small carbonate platforms, 30 km2, are not well documented, even though they are common in ancient and modern carbonate systems. This study investigates depositional facies and evolution of a Miocene carbonate platform in Central Luconia. An integrated approach including core-described lithofacies, well-log correlation, and seismic analysis, allowed for mapping facies through time. The platform was divided into five stratigraphic zones separated by low porosity intervals. Five depositional facies groups were recognized in core samples: (1) bioclastic wacke-packstone facies deposited in a platform interior, (2) bioclastic packstone facies deposited in backreef environments, (3) coral boundstone facies deposited at the reef margin, (4) interbedded shale and carbonate facies deposited on the slope, and (5) argillaceous carbonate facies deposited across the platform as flooding layers. Six seismic facies were identified and combined with well data to map the five facies groups through time. The platform shows repeated backstepping of facies at flooding layers followed by aggradation of facies belts up to exposure surfaces, resulting in a long-term backstepping of depositional environments until the platform drowned.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477192
2024-11-20
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dunham, R. J., 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional textures. AAPG Memoir, 1, 108–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Henglai, P., Fongngern, R., SailerA., 2024. The growth and demise of a Middle Miocene carbonate platform in Central Luconia, offshore Malaysia. Mar Pet Geol163:106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.marpetgeo.2024.106763.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kosa, E., 2015. Sea-level changes, shoreline journeys, and the seismic stratigraphy of Central Luconia, Miocene-pre sent, offshore Sarawak, NW Borneo. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.07.005.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lunt, P., Madon, M., 2017. A review of the Sarawak Cycles: History and modern application. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 63, 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.7186/bgsm63201704.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mathew, M., Makhankova, A., Menier, D., Sautter, B., Betzler, C, Pierson, B., 2020. The emergence of Miocene reefs in South China Sea and its resilient adaptability under varying eustatic, climatic and oceanographic conditions. Scientific Reports, 7141(10), https://doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64119-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Poret, K., Sailer, A., Henglai, P., Laitrakull, K., 2022. Field X, Central Luconia, Offshore Sarawak, Malaysia, Early appraisal stage reservoir characterization. Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Virtual and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 2022, https://doi.org/10.4043/31515-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ting, K. K., Pierson, B. J., Jaaidi, O. A., Hague, P. F., 2011. Effects of syn-depositional tectonics on platform geometry and reservoir characters in Miocene carbonate platforms of Central Luconia, Sarawak. International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2011–2012, Expanded Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-14247-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vahrenkamp, V.C, 1998. Miocene carbonates of the Luconia Province, Offshore Sarawak, Implications for regional geology and reservoir properties from strontium-isotope stratigraphy. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 42, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Warrlich, G M. D., Adams, E. W., Ryba, A., Tam, T., Ting, K. K., Tang, H. K., 2019. What matters for flow and recovery in carbonate gas reservoirs, insights from the mature Central Luconia Province, Offshore Sarawak, Malaysia. AAPG Bulletin, 103, 691–721, https://doi.10.1306/09051817219.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477192
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202477192
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error