1887

Abstract

Summary

In recent years, many risks arisen during the exploitation of geothermal resources, gas storage and CCUS, which can be detected effectively by long-term microseismic monitoring. However, most of microseismic processing methods was developed for short-term monitoring during hydro-fracturing, and has limitations of high acquisition costs and low automation when applied to the long-term monitoring. An automated processing flow based on machine-learning is established by this paper, meeting the application of long-term microseismic monitoring. This flow is applied to microseismic data of hot dry rock fracturing acquired by shallow borehole receivers, and benchmarked with the traditional processing method, verifying the reliability of machine-learning methods in long-term microseismic monitoring. Our result shows a high data quality of shallow bore-hole receivers. Compared with traditional methods, the denoising and phase picking methods based on neural network achieve much higher S/N ratio and PS picking accuracy. The wrong picks are excluded by automatic quality control method based on Gaussian Mixture Model effectively. And the relocation result is similar to the traditional method with manually quality control. Combined with shallow bore-hole receivers, the automatic processing flow in this study has a good potential in the long-term microseismic data processing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202478007
2024-10-29
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LomaxA, MicheliniA, CurtisA.Earthquake Location, Direct, Global-Search Methods[Z]. 20092449–2473.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MünchmeyerJ, WoollamJ, RietbrockA, et al.Which Picker Fits My Data? A Quantitative Evaluation of Deep Learning Based Seismic Pickers[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2022, 127(1): e2021J–e23499J.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. StorkA L, NixonC G, HawkesC D, et al.Is CO2 injection at Aquistore aseismic? A combined seismological and geomechanical study of early injection operations[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 75:107–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ZhuW, McBreartyI W, MousaviS M, et al.Earthquake Phase Association Using a Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2022, 127(5): e2021J–e23249J.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhuW, MousaviS M, BerozaG C.Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(11):9476–9488.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ZhuW, BerozaG C.PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202478007
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202478007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error