Using an ML Driven Reservoir Characterization for CCUS Workflows

References

1. Alcalde, J., Flude, S., Wilkinson, M., Johnson, G., Edlmann, K., Bond, C. E.,… and Haszeldine, R. S. [2018]. Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2201. Arts, R., Eiken, O., Chadwick, A., Zweigel, P., van der Meer, L., and Zinszner, B. [2004]. Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data. Energy, 29(9–10), 1383–1392.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aqrawi, A. A., Barka, D. S., and Weinzierl, W. [2013]. A Hybrid and Adaptive Attribute for Noise Reduction in Post-Stack Seismic Data. EAGE Annual Meeting. London.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aqrawi, A. A. and AqrawiA. A. [2014]. Structural Oriented Signal Decomposition Using Adaptive Frequency Distributions. EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aqrawi, A. A. and Aqrawi, A. A. [2023]. Implementing Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Image Processing in Post-stack Seismic Data to Delineated Structural Geological Features. OTC Brazil.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berkhout, A. J. [2012]. Combining full wavefield migration and full waveform inversion, a glance into the future of seismic imaging. Geophysics, 77(2), S43–S50, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011–0148.1.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, A.R. [2011]. Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K. [2007]. Seismic Attributes For Prospect Identification And Reservoir Characterization. SEG Geophysical Developments Series.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Global CCS Institute. [2022]. The Global Status of CCS 2022. Global CCS Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
9. International Energy Agency (IEA). [2021]. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. IEA.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jo, T. [2021]. Machine Learning Foundations. Supervised, Unsupervised, and Advanced Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Landrø, M. [2001]. Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation changes from time-lapse seismic data. Geophysics66 (3), 836–844. https://doi.org/10.1190/ 1.1444973.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Rickman, Rick, Mullen, Mike, Petre, Erik, Grieser, Bill, and Donald Kundert. [2008]. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, September 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/115258-MS
    [Google Scholar]
13. Sayers, C.M., Johnson, G.M., and Denyer, G. [2002]. Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic data. Geophysics67(4), 1286–1292. https://doi.Org/10.1190/1.1500391.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sircar, Anirbid, KritiYadav, KamakshiRayavarapu, NamrataBist, and HemangiOza. 2021. Application of machine learning and artificial intelligence in oil and gas industry. Petroleum Research.
    [Google Scholar]