1887

Abstract

Summary

The anelasticity of the medium will cause dissipation of seismic energy, thus attenuating the amplitude and modifying the frequency content of the propagating wavelet. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in the near-surface weathering layer and in the presence of gas chimney or gas cloud. Taking into account the anelastic effects in data processing is necessary for high resolution seismic imaging of geologic structures and petroleum reservoirs covered by such complex overburden media. Besides inverse Q filtering and Q-based seismic migration, redatuming with attenuation compensation is a promising alternative. To handle acquisition footprints, uneven illumination, and avoid wavefield leakage from the overburden, we propose a dual-parameter least squares redatuming approach based on a true-amplitude viscoacoustic one-way wave propagator and a constrained optimization algorithm. Numerical examples demonstrate that this method can retrieve virtual data with corrected amplitudes and phases, which eventually facilitates high-resolution and high-fidelity imaging below the viscoacoustic strata.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101080
2025-06-02
2026-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakulin, A. and Calvert, R. [2004] Virtual source: new method for imaging and 4D below complex overburden. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2477–2480.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berryhill, J.R. [1979] Wave-equation datuming. Geophysics, 44(8), 1329–1344.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biondi, E., Barnier, G., Biondi, B. and Clapp, R.G. [2023] Target-oriented elastic full-waveform inversion through acoustic extended image-space redatuming. Geophysics, 88(3), R269–R296.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ji, J. [1997] Least squares imaging, datuming, and interpolation using the wave equation. SEP, 75, 121–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kjartansson, E. [1979] Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B9), 4737–4748.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Krohn, C.E. and Murray, T.J. [2016] Shallow near-surface effects. Geophysics, 81(5), T221–T231.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Van der Neut, J. and Herrmann, F.J. [2013] Interferometric redatuming by sparse inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 192(2), 666–670.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pride, S.R., Berryman, J.G. and Harris, J.M. [2004] Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B1).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schuster, G.T. and Zhou, M. [2006] A theoretical overview of model-based and correlation-based reda-tuming methods. Geophysics, 71(4), SI103–SI110.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wapenaar, C., Cox, H. and Berkhout, A. [1992] Elastic redatuming of multicomponent seismic data 1. Geophysical prospecting, 40(4), 465–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. White, J.E. [1975] Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics, 40(2), 224–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu, F. and Cheng, J. [2022] An extension of least-squares redatuming: Simultaneous reconstruction of overburden reflectivities and virtual data. Journal of Computational Physics, 461, 111159.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101080
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101080
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error