Reservoir Elastic Properties Prediction using Supervised Deep Learning versus Model-Based Inversion Methods

References

1. Ahmed, N., Waldemar Weibull, W., Grana, D. and Bhakta, T. [2024a] Constrained nonlinear amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion for reservoir dynamic changes estimation from time-lapse seismic data. Geophysics, 89(1), R1–R15.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, N., Weibull, W., Bhakta, T. and Luo, X. [2024b] Viscoelastic Seismic Inversion for Time-Lapse Saturation and Pore Pressure Changes Monitoring. In: 85th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition (including the Workshop Programme), 2024. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–5.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahmed, N., Weibull, W.W. and Grana, D. [2022] Constrained non-linear AVO inversion based on the adjoint-state optimization. Computers & Geosciences, 105214.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ahmed, N., Weibull, WW, Quintal, B., Grana, D. and Bhakta, T. [2023] Frequency-dependent AVO inversion applied to physically based models for seismic attenuation. Geophysical Journal International, 233(1), 234–252.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B. and Thurber, C.H. [2018] Parameter estimation and inverse problems. Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buland, A. and Omre, H. [2003] Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics, 68(1), 185–198.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Das, V. and Mukerji, T. [2020] Petrophysical properties prediction from prestack seismic data using convolutional neural networks. Geophysics, 85(5), N41–N55.
   [Google Scholar]
8. de Figueiredo, L.P, Grana, D., Roisenberg, M. and Rodrigues, B.B. [2019] Multimodal Markov chain Monte Carlo method for nonlinear petrophysical seismic inversion. Geophysics, 84(5), M1–M13.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Grana, D., Azevedo, L. and Liu, M. [2020] A comparison of deep machine learning and Monte Carlo methods for facies classification from seismic data. Geophysics, 85(4), WA41–WA52.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hussain, M., Chun, W.Y., Khalid, P., Ahmed, N. and Mahmood, A. [2017] Improving petrophysical analysis and rock physics parameters estimation through statistical analysis of Basal sands, Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42, 327–337.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Liu, M. and Grana, D. [2018] Stochastic nonlinear inversion of seismic data for the estimation of petroe-lastic properties using the ensemble smoother and data reparameterization. Geophysics, 83(3), M25–M39.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Oikonomou, D., Larsen, E., Alaei, B., Stefos, G and Purves, S. [2019] EarthNET a native cloud web based solution for next generation subsurface workflows. In: 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 Workshop Programme, 2019. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Zhang, J., Li, J., Chen, X., Li, Y., Huang, G. and Chen, Y. [2021] Robust deep learning seismic inversion with a priori initial model constraint. Geophysical Journal International, 225(3), 2001–2019.
    [Google Scholar]