1887

Abstract

Summary

This study addresses the critical issue of seismic data interpretation: accurate identification of gas chimneys in the presence of interfering shallow gas-bearing sediments. The conventional machine-learning methods, especially multilayer perceptron (MLP), have been popular for gas-chimney detection but poorly distinguish chimney signatures from those surrounded by features with similar characteristics. To overcome these limitations, we have applied a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) method that directly learns spatial relationships from the data. We trained a CNN model on seismic sections using amplitude data combined with similarity attributes and signal-to-noise ratio as input features. In an effort to tackle the limited number of training examples, we followed a patch-based approach with 25×49 sample dimensions. The model, when tested on the North Sea F3 block dataset, resulted in 95% training accuracy and 93% validation accuracy. Results show significantly improved discrimination between true gas chimneys and non-chimney intervals, such as shallow gas-concentrated sediments and dewatering zones. This enhanced detection capability allows for better characterization of near-subsurface fluid migration pathways and associated drilling hazards, showing the potential of deep learning in advancing seismic interpretation tasks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101328
2025-06-02
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aminzadeh, F., de Groot, P., Berge, T., Oldenziel, T., & Ligtenberg, H. [2001] Determining migration path from seismically derived gas chimney. In AAPG Hedberg Conference, Near-Surface Hydrocarbon Migration: Mechanisms and Seepage Rates.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hashemi, H., Tax, D. M. J., Duin, R. P. W., Javaherian, A., & De Groot, P. [2008] Gas chimney detection based on improving the performance of combined multilayer perceptron and support vector classifier. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 15(6), 863–871.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HegglandR., MeldahlP., PalmerG., de GrootP. [1999] The chimney cube, an example of semi-automated detection of seismic objects by directive attributes and neural networks: part II; interpretation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 935–940, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MeldahlP., HegglandR., PalmerG., de GrootP. [1999] The chimney cube, an example of semi-automated detection of seismic objects by directive attributes and neural networks: part I; methodology, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, pp. 931–934.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Puget, J. F. [2017] Feature Engineering For Deep Learning. Inside Machine learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Vrbančič, G., and V.Podgorelec. [2020] Transfer Learning with Adaptive Fine-Tuning. IEEE Access8: 196197–196211.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101328
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101328
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error