1887

Abstract

Summary

Detecting fluids is crucial for reservoir characterization. Traditionally, this is done using AVO seismic inversion to estimate elastic properties and Rock Physics Templates (RPTs) to link these properties to fluid content. However, AVO inversion can be limited by dependency on low-frequency models, elastic and isotropic medium assumptions, and assumptions of low contrast properties. These limitations can lead to errors in elastic property estimation and fluid interpretation.

DL offers a promising alternative, addressing traditional challenges by predicting elastic properties with a data-driven approach. DL can handle nonlinear relationships, large property contrasts, and input a variety of data features to guide the predictions. In this study, we investigate two key aspects: (1) Deep Learning’s ability to predict fluid-sensitive elastic properties and (2) the impact of seismic data on these predictions.

We ran tests on the Volve dataset and found that DL predictions accurately captured elastic properties and fluid trends in blind wells. DL predictions distinguished HC-bearing wells from dry wells, aligning closely with measurements. Seismic data emerged as the most critical input for detecting fluid anomalies.

The results demonstrate DL’s ability to uncover fluid-related trends quickly and accurately, highlighting its potential as a robust method for reservoir characterization and HC detection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101352
2025-06-02
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adler, A., Araya, M., and Poggio, T. [2021]. Deep learning for seismic inverse problems: Toward the acceleration of geophysical analysis workflows. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 89–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Avseth, P., Janke, A., and Horn, F. [2016]. AVO inversion in exploration — Key learnings from a Norwegian Sea prospect. The Leading Edge, 35(5), 405–410, 412–414.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buland, A., Kolbjørnsen, O., Hauge, R., Skjæveland, Ø., and Duffaut, K. [2008]. Bayesian lithology and fluid prediction from seismic prestack data. GEOPHYSICS, 73(3), C13–C21.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Buland, A., and Omre, H. [2003]. Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. GEOPHYSICS, 68(1), 185–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Equinor ASA [2018]. Volve Field Dataset. Available at: https://www.equinor.com/energy/volve-data-sharing
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heir, A., Aghayev, S., Tran, C. and Molder, A. [2024]. Inversion with stratigraphy-guided deep learning. GEOPHYSICS, 89, R377–R386.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, H., Lin, J., Wu, B., Gao, J., and Liu, N. [2022]. Elastic properties estimation from prestack seismic data using GGCNNs and application on tight sandstone reservoir characterization. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60, 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ødegaard, E., and Avseth, P. [2004]. Well log and seismic data analysis using rock physics templates. First Break, 22(10), 37–43
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101352
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101352
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error