1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon Management Canada (CMC) performed a technical gap analysis for the uptake of large-scale geological carbon storage (GCS) in saline aquifers in Alberta, as well as gaps identified for CO2 storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs. We have identified and addressed key gaps that act as barriers to large-scale adoption of GCS in Alberta. Risk estimates of likelihood and severity of consequence were assigned to each gap, organized around seven main themes: Regulatory requirements for monitoring, need for established MMV technologies at scale, storage in depleted reservoirs, immature public acceptance, managing pore space conflicts, potential adverse interference between projects, and under-development of storage options. While this analysis took the perspective from the onshore CO2 storage domain of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, most of the identified gaps are relevant to other regions and jurisdictions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101354
2025-06-02
2026-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alberta Energy Regulator. [2024]. Directive 065: Resources Applications for Oil and Gas Reservoirs. https://static.aer.ca/prd/documents/directives/Directive065.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Macquet, M., Lawton, D., Osadetz, K., Maidment, G., Bertram, M., Hall, K., Kolkman-Quinn, B., Parra, J.M., Race, F., Savard, G. and Wang, Y. [2022]. Overview of Carbon Management Canada's pilot-scale CO2 injection site for developing and testing monitoring technologies for carbon capture and storage, and methane detection. CSEG Recorder, 47(1), p.27.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pevzner, R., Isaenkov, R., Yavuz, S., Yurikov, A., Tertyshnikov, K., Shashkin, P., Gurevich, B., Correa, J., Glubokovskikh, S., Wood, T., Freifeld, B., and Barraclough, P. [2021]. Seismic monitoring of a small CO2 injection using a multi-well DAS array: Operations and initial results of stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway Project: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 110, 103437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103437.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Quest. [2022]. Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project Annual Summary Report - Alberta Department of Energy, https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/356aeeda-134c-4779-971c-931573400ddf/resource/8a1b4350-9634-4e66-a983-8c16199fa2e7/download/quest-annual-summary-report-2022-alberta-department-of-energy.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ringrose, P.S., Mathieson, A.S., Wright, I.W., Selama, F., Hansen, O., Bissell, R., Saoula, N., and Midgley, J. [2013]. The In Salah CO2 storage project: Lessons learned and Knowledge Transfer: Energy Procedia, 37, 6226–6236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.551.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams-Stroud, S., Bauer, R., Leetaru, H., Oye, V., Stanek, F., Greenberg, S., and Langet, N. [2020]. Analysis of Microseismicity and Reactivated Fault Size to Assess the Potential for Felt Events by CO2 Injection in the Illinois Basin: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 110, 2188–2204, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200112.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101354
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101354
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error