1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic angle gathers and spectral seismic attributes offer complementary insights to improve understanding of complex subsurface characteristics. However, the labor-intensive process of subsurface characterization, data annotation, limited labeled data, and subsurface complexity make it difficult to leverage these insights via supervised learning approaches.

To overcome such challenges and benefit from the strength of spectral seismic attributes, this study introduces a novel hierarchical Self-Organizing Map (SOM) framework to integrate spectral seismic attributes like scalograms and spectrograms (joint time-frequency analyses) extracted from angle gathers.

In our current research, firstly, we trained individual SOMs, as an unsupervised pattern recognition algorithm on reflectivity images, angle-gathers, and the spectral seismic attributes extracted from angle-dependent data. Secondly, we deploy a hierarchical SOM network to combine and analyze all these datasets. Thirdly, we evaluate the hierarchical approach and standalone analyses of clustering quality and information content using the binary boundary maps and the performance metrics. Our findings indicated that, the scalogram-based hierarchical SOM, containing information of different angles, achieves the lowest Quantization Error and Davis-Bouldin Index, indicating optimal feature representation and well-separated clusters. The findings stress the potential of hierarchical networks and joint time-frequency analyses from angle gathers for robust seismic interpretation workflows.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101357
2025-06-02
2026-03-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, J.B., and Rabiner, L. (1977). A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis and synthesis. Proc. IEEE, 65(11), 1558–1564. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1977.10770
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, A.R. (2022). A practical guide to seismic reservoir characterization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99854-7
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castagna, J.P., Sun, S., and Siegfried, R.W. (2003). Instantaneous spectral analysis: Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The Leading Edge, 22(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567212
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chopra, S., and Marfurt, K.J. (2005). Seismic attributes—A historical perspective. Geophysics, 70(5), 3SO–28SO. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2098670
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuesta Cano, A., Karimzadanzabi, A., Storms, J.E.A., Rongier, G., Verschuur, D.J., and Martinius, A.W. (2025, under review). Discretization of small-scale, stratigraphic heterogeneities and its impact on the seismic response: Lessons from the application of process-based modelling. Geophys. Prospect.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davydenko, M., and Verschuur, D.J. (2017). Full-wavefield estimation of angle-dependent reflectivity and migration velocity. SEG Tech. Prog. Exp. Abstracts 2017, 5631–5635. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17681198.1
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Di, H., and Abubakar, A. (2022). Estimating subsurface properties using a semisupervised neural network approach. Geophysics, 87(1), IM1–IM10. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2021-0192.1
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fomel, S. (2007). Local seismic attributes. Geophysics, 72(3), A29–A33. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2437573
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gong, X., and Richman, M.B. (1995). On the application of cluster analysis to growing season precipitation data in North America east of the Rockies. J. Clim., 8(4), 897–931. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Karimzadanzabi, A., Cuesta Cano, A., and Verschuur, E. (2024). Analyzing angle-gather spectrograms: Going beyond seismic resolution. 85th EAGE Annu. Conf. Exhib., June 2024, 1–5. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202410931
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kohonen, T. (1982). Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern., 43(1), 59–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lin, L., Zhong, Z., Li, C., Gorman, A., Wei, H., Kuang, Y., Wen, S., Cai, Z., and Hao, F. (2024). Machine learning for subsurface geological feature identification from seismic data: Methods, datasets, challenges, and opportunities. Earth-Sci. Rev., 257, 104887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104887
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Z., Cao, J., Chen, S., Lu, Y., and Tan, F. (2020). Visualization analysis of seismic facies based on deep embedded SOM. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.2986365
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mallat, S.G. (1999). A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mansoor, S.V. (2021). Multi-attribute seismic analysis using unsupervised machine learning method: Self-organizing maps. Publisher and DOI Needed.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Roden, R., Smith, T., and Sacrey, D. (2015). Geologic pattern recognition from seismic attributes: Principal component analysis and self-organizing maps. Interpretation, 3(4), SAE59–SAE83. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2015-0037.1
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sava, P., and Fomel, S. (2003). Angle-domain common-image gathers by wavefield continuation methods. Geophysics, 68(4), 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581078
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Storms, J.E.A. (2003). Event-based stratigraphic simulation of wave-dominated shallow-marine environments. Mar. Geol., 199(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00144-0
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Unglert, K., Radić, V., and Jellinek, M. (2016). Principal component analysis vs. self-organizing maps combined with hierarchical clustering for pattern recognition in volcano seismic spectra. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.04.014
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Veeken, P.C.H., and Rauch-Davies, M. (2006). AVO attribute analysis and seismic reservoir characterization. First Break, 24(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2006004
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yin, H. (2008). The self-organizing maps: Background, theories, extensions, and applications. In Computational Intelligence: A Compendium (pp. 715–762). Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101357
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101357
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error