1887

Abstract

Summary

Marine vibrators (MVibs) are gaining traction as an alternative to conventional airguns for their ability to generate low-frequency, flexible, and repeatable waves with minimal impact on marine wildlife. However, the Doppler shift caused by source motion complicates seismic processing. Phase dispersion simulation or correction can be achieved using a dephasing operator equation based on the instantaneous frequency function, while it requires sufficient spatial sampling to get the proper effect. Besides, surface-related multiple removal is crucial for seismic imaging quality. Despite advances in surface-related multiple elimination (SRME), issues like coarse spatial sampling, missing near-offsets, unequal source and receiver spacing, and time-variant observation positions cause significant discrepancies between predicted and true multiples. We propose a Bayesian primary-multiple separation and Doppler-shift correction iterative algorithm, which assumes approximate shearlet-domain independence of SRME-type moving MVib primaries and multiples, and separate and correct them robustly. In our approach, the shearlet properties determine the energy mismatch between separated and predicted components. Additionally, the F-K domain phase distortion operator based on the instantaneous frequency function incorporates the source motion aspects into the shearlet dictionary, reducing computational costs. Finally, the introduction of linear moveout (LMO) mitigates the Doppler-shift correction sensitivity to spatial aliasing. Synthetic example confirms our approach’s effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510137
2025-06-02
2026-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aldridge, D.F. [1992] Mathematics of linear sweeps. Canadian journal of exploration geophysics, 28(1), 62–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Daubechies, L, Defrise, M. and De Mol, C. [2004] An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Journal Issued by the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, 57(11), 1413–1457.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Donno, D., Chauris, H. and Noble, M. [2010] Curvelet-based multiple prediction. Geophysics, 75(6), WB255–WB263.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dragoset, W.H. [1988] Marine vibrators and the Doppler effect. Geophysics, 53(11), 1388–1398.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo, K. and Labate, D. [2007a] Optimally sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 39(1), 298–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo, K. and Labate, D. [2007b] Sparse shearlet representation of Fourier integral operators. Electronic Research Announcements in Mathematical Sciences, 14(29), 7–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guo, K. and Labate, D. [2013] The construction of smooth Parseval frames of shearlets. Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, 8(1), 82–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hampson, G. and Jakubowicz, H. [1995] The effects of source and receiver motion on seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 43(2), 221–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kittipoom, P., Kutyniok, G. and Lim, W.Q. [2012] Construction of compactly supported shearlet frames. Constructive Approximation, 35, 21–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, Y., Cichocki, A. and Amari, S.i. [2004] Analysis of sparse representation and blind source separation. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 16(6), 1193–1234.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosenfeld, A. [1976] Digital picture processing. Academic press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Secker, S., Mascomere, J.P. and Robin, A. [2024] Marine vibrator source motion correction for strictly monotonic sweeps. Geophysical Prospecting, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, D., Saab, R., Yilmaz, Ö. and Herrmann, F.J. [2008] Bayesian wavefield separation by transform-domain sparsity promotion. Geophysics, 73(5), A33–A38.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zibulevsky, M. and Pearlmutter, B.A. [2001] Blind source separation by sparse decomposition in a signal dictionary. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 13(4), 863–882.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510137
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510137
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error