1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has emerged as a critical technology for combating climate change by reducing CO emissions from industrial and energy sectors. A key decision in CCS development is the choice between onshore and offshore storage sites, each presenting unique technical, economic, and environmental trade-offs that influence their feasibility and long-term effectiveness.

Since the first dedicated CCS project began operation in 1996, the technology has advanced significantly, showcasing the viability of long-term CO storage, along with the critical role of monitoring protocols. Building on decades of experience and integrating advanced technologies such as seismic imaging, real-time sensors, satellite monitoring, and AI-driven data analytics, CCS projects today are better positioned to meet the challenges of global decarbonization.

This paper explores the lessons learned from past CCS projects and evaluates the challenges, opportunities, and critical factors that determine the suitability of onshore and offshore environments for future development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101414
2025-06-02
2026-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Quest Project [2023] Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project Annual Summary Report Alberta Department of Energy: 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller, et al. [2016] Simultaneous Acquisition of Distributed Acoustic Sensing VSP with Multi-mode and Single-mode Fiber-optic Cables and 3C-Geophones at the Aquistore CO2 Storage Site.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. OropezaBacci, et al. [2017] Using a Walk-away DAS Time-lapse VSP for CO2 Plume Monitoring at the Quest CCS Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wortha, et al. [2014] Aquistore Project Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification: From Concept to CO2 Injection.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. A.K.Furre [2024] Sleipner 26 years: how well-established subsurface monitoring work processes have contributed to successful offshore CO2 injection.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chadwick [2006] Geophysical Monitoring of the CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ScottMcDonalds [2012] Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Project (Project Overview, Lessons, & Future Plans).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ScottMcDonalds [2017] Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage Project (Eliminating CO2, Emissions from the productions of Bio Fuels – A 'Green’ Carbon Process).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101414
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101414
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error