1887

Abstract

Summary

During burial of sedimentary rocks clay mineralogy of shaly units impact how the rock compact, both mechanically and chemically through shale diagenesis, at the same time also affecting its flow properties. Correspondingly, this also affect how the pressure generation and dissipation evolve through the burial history of the sediments. This study use a basin modelling approach for investigating the effect of smectite-to-illite transition in shales on its permeability and the overpressure development, constrained by the availability of potassium. The study focus on well 6507/5-4 in the Norwegian Sea and hence is limited to 1D simulations and vertical effects. To match measured smectite fractions in Well 6507/5-4, the initial depositional smectite fraction and the availability of potassium have been calculated by inverting a forward, kinetic model of smectite-illite transformation through the well’s burial history. The resulting available potassium is not uniform but seen to be varying in the shaly sections, most likely due to different depositional environments. Monte-Carlo simulations for overpressure modelling was carried out by varying the available potassium. The onset of overpressure is modelled to coincide with the onset of smectite-illite transformation. The available potassium is instrumental for the changing smectite fraction, indirectly controlling pressure dissipation vertically.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101425
2025-06-02
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cicchino, A. M. P., Sargent, C., Goulty, N. R., & Ramdhan, A. M. (2015). Regional variation in cretaceous mudstone compaction trends across Haltenbanken, offshore mid-Norway. Petroleum Geoscience, 21(1), 17– 34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Grauls, D. (1998). Overpressure assessment using a minimum principal stress approach. Overpressures in petroleum exploration. Workshop proceedings in petroleum exploration, Pau (France), 7–8 April. Elf Exploration Production, Centre Scientifique etTechnique.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, W.-L., Longo, J. M., & Pevear, D. R. (1993). An experimentally derived kinetic model for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer. Clay and Clay Minerals, 41(2), 162–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lothe, A. E., Grøver, A., Roli, O.-A., Stenebråten, J., & Kristiansen, T. G. (2024). Simulations of the effect of smectite-to-illite transition in shales on permeability and overpressures using a stochastic approach, a Norwegian margin case study. Basin Research, 36, e12815
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mondol, N. H., Fawad, M., Jahren, J., & Bjørlykke, K. (2008). Synthetic mudstone compaction trends and their use in pore pressure prediction. First Break, 26, 43–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Swarbrick, R. E., Osborne, M., & Yardley, G. S. (2002). Comparison of overpressure magnitude resulting from the main generating mechanisms. In A. R.Huffman & G. L.Bowers (Eds.), Pressure regimes in sedimentary basins and their predictions (Vol. 76, pp.1–12). AAPG Memoir.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Walderhaug, O. (1996). Kinetic modeling of quartz cementation and porosity loss in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 80(5), 731–745.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101425
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101425
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error