1887

Abstract

Summary

Demultiple of ocean-bottom-node data remains a challenging task in shallow water environments. Up-down deconvolution has become popular in such settings, producing an earth reflectivity estimate free of the source wavelet and surface-related multiples. The earth reflectivity may be taken forward for further processing or alternatively convolved with the input data to predict the corresponding surface-related multiples. The multiples may be directly subtracted or adaptively subtracted from the input data, a strategy which enables a thorough QC of the demultiple process. We propose an inversion-driven multiple prediction approach for ocean-bottom-node data based on source-side convolutions. The method may be applied with similar horizontally homogeneous geology (1.5D) assumptions to many up-down deconvolution implementations or alternatively using full 3D multi-dimensional summations, which overcome the flat-layer assumption. As normally the 3D approach is under-sampled, we propose a 2.5D implementation working on each receiver-line separately, with a translation of the prediction operator in the y-direction. The algorithm is supported by synthetic data analysis as well as a real dataset from the Norwegian North Sea.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101608
2025-06-02
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen, L. [2001] Elimination of free-surface related multiples without the need of the source wavelet. Geophysics, 66(1), 327–341, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444912.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Haacke, R. and Poole, G. [2023] Source-side multi-dimensional deconvolution using a downgoing annihilation filter approach. Second EAGE seabed seismic today workshop, September 2023, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2023628014.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hampson, G. and Szumksi, G. [2020] Down/down deconvolution. EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2020611022.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LokshtanovD. [2000] Suppression of free-surface effects from multicomponent sea-floor data. EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.28.L52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lokshtanov, D. [2021] Fast and efficient up-down decomposition and deconvolution of OBS data. EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202011281.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Musil, M. and Kostov, C. [2008] A 2.5D method for removal of free-surface related events. EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20147755.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pica, A., Manin, M., Granger, P.Y., Marin, D., Suaudeau, E., David, B., Poulain, G. and Herrmann, P.H. [2006] 3D SRME on OBS data using waveform multiple modelling. 76th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2370074.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verschuur, D. and Neumann, E. [1999] Integration of OBS data and surface data for OBS multiple removal. 69th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 1350–1353, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820762.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101608
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101608
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error