1887

Abstract

Summary

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in geological formations (aquifers, salt caverns, and depleted reservoirs) is a promising large-scale solution, with capacities reaching terawatt-hours. Depleted reservoirs are especially suitable due to well-characterized geological structures, existing wells and surface facilities, reduced cost of field exploration and decommissioning, lower investment cost, and proven sealing capabilities.

To assess the feasibility of offshore UHS in Norway for powering platforms with renewables, interdisciplinary research has been conducted under the HyStorm project and the Hydrogeni FME Centre, combining experimental and modeling approaches to evaluate H2 storage potential in depleted offshore reservoirs.

This paper summarizes completed and ongoing work within these projects, focusing on hydrogen storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs. The studies include:

  1. Evaluation of the hydrogen storage potential of shut-down fields on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
  2. Phase behaviour and black-oil simulations to model fluid dynamics in reservoir systems.
  3. Hydrogen sorption/desorption experiments on clay minerals and shale caprocks.
  4. Measurements of hydrogen and hydrogen-methane mixture viscosity for flow characterization.
  5. Risk assessment of legacy wells and their potential impact on storage security.
  6. Long-term reservoir sandstone and caprock shale exposure experiments, followed by post-exposure analysis using gas chromatography, XRD, and acoustic/rock mechanical tests.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101675
2025-06-02
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, E., Møyner, O., Raynaud, X., and Nilsen, H. M. [2024]. Phase behavior and black-oil simulations of Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers. Advances in Water Resources, 191, 104772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104772
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Betken, B., Austegard, A., Finotti, F., Caccamo, C., Stang, H. G. J., Khosravi, B., and Span, R. [2024]. Measurements of the Viscosity of Hydrogen and a (Hydrogen + Methane) Mixture with a Two-Capillary Viscometer. International Journal of Thermophysics, 45(4), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-023-03328-6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Betken, B., Khosravi, B., Sabozin, F., Thol, M., and Span, R. [2025]. Measurements of the Viscosity of n-Hydrogen and (n-Hydrogen + Carbon Dioxide), (n-Hydrogen + Methane), and (n-Hydrogen + Ethane) Mixtures at Temperatures from (253.15 to 473.15) K and at Pressures up to 20 MPa. International Journal of Thermophysics, 46(4), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-024-03492-3
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chichester, J. C., and Huber, M. L. [2008]. Documentation and assessment of the transport property model for mixtures implemented in NIST REFPROP (version 8.0) (No. NIST IR 6650; p. NIST IR 6650). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6650
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Emmel, B., Bjørkvik, B., Cerasi, P., Stroisz, A., Hönekopp, L., and Freymann, L. [2024]. Sandstone Hydrogen Exposure Experiment under in-Situ Reservoir Conditions from a Depleted and Decommissioned Gas Field. EAGE GET 2024. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202421123
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Emmel, B., Bjørkvik, B., Frøyen, T. L., Cerasi, P., and Stroisz, A. [2023]. Evaluating the hydrogen storage potential of shut down oil and gas fields along the Norwegian continental shelf. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(63), 24385–24400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.138
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., Miocic, J. M., Hangx, S. J. T., Kallmeyer, J., Ostertag-Henning, C., … Rudloff, A. [2021]. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media – the scientific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(2), 853–864. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE03536J
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huber, M., Harvey, A., Lemmon, E., Hardin, G., Bell, I., and McLinden, M. [2018]. NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP) Version 10 - SRD 23 [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4/1502528
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Masoudi, M., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Hellevang, H., and Haszeldine, R. S. [2024]. Lined rock caverns: A hydrogen storage solution. Journal of Energy Storage, 84, 110927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110927
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Masoudi, M., Nooraiepour, M., Blom, R., Xi, K., Cerasi, P., and Hellevang, H. [2025]. Impact of hydration on hydrogen sorption in clay minerals and shale caprocks: Implications for hydrogen energy and waste storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 99, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.247
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Muzny, C. D., Huber, M. L., and Kazakov, A. F. [2013]. Correlation for the Viscosity of Normal Hydrogen Obtained from Symbolic Regression. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 58(4), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1021/je301273j
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stroisz, A. M., Føyen, T., Emmel, B., Bhuiyan, M. H., and Cerasi, P. [2022]. Impact of hydrogen on rock strength and ultrasonic velocity. Presented at the International Geomechanics Symposium, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zonetti, S., Dupuy, B., Emmel, B., and Romdhane, A. [2023]. Monitoring casing corrosion of legacy wells using CSEM: Implications for large-scale energy and CO2 storage projects in shut-down hydrocarbon fields. The Leading Edge, 42(12), 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle42120808.1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101675
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.2025101675
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error