1887

Abstract

Summary

In seismic exploration, establishing a reliable velocity model is crucial for seismic migration imaging and reservoir description. Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) aims to recover subsurface physical parameters by minimizing the misfit between the observed and synthetic data, theoretically offering the highest modeling accuracy. However, FWI’s success relies on a good initial model due to its nonlinearity. We propose a Face-Constrained Kriging (FC-Kriging) method based on well log interpolation to establish a better initial model for FWI. We firstly use the initial model to perform reverse time migration (RTM) to extract stratigraphic structure. Based on the stratigraphic information, we further obtain seismic facies classification results. The facies model provides useful lateral structural information in the FC-Kriging method, which enables effective interpolation results even with a limited number of wells data. Compared with conventional Kriging, the FC-Kriging method produces clearer boundaries and higher resolution, which contributes to a more accurate initial model for FWI. In addition, the FC-Kriging method can mitigate the local “bull’s eye” anomalies in conventional Kriging method. The residual anomalies in the FC-Kriging results can also be further eliminated through subsequent FWI. We have applied this methodology to the synthetic model, and the results proved the correctness and effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510360
2025-06-02
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Tarantola, A. [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Virieux, J., & Operto, S. [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tran, K. T., & Hiltunen, D. R. [2012] Two-dimensional inversion of full waveforms using simulated annealing. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(9), 1075–1090.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bunks, C., Saleck, F. M., Zaleski, S., & Chavent, G. [1995] Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shin, C., & Cha, Y. H. [2008] Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain. Geophysical Journal International, 173(3), 922–931.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shin, C., & Ho Cha, Y. [2009] Waveform inversion in the Laplace—Fourier domain. Geophysical Journal International, 177(3), 1067–1079.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, R. S., Luo, J., & Wu, B. [2014] Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model. Geophysics, 79(3), WA13–WA24.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y., Chen, H., Xiang, K., & Chen, X. [2016] Geological structure guided well log interpolation for high-fidelity full waveform inversion. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 207(2), 1313–1331.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansen, T. M., Mosegaard, K., & Schiøtt, C. R. [2010] Kriging interpolation in seismic attribute space applied to the South Arne Field, North Sea. Geophysics, 75(6), P31–P41.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510360
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510360
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error