1887

Abstract

Summary

CO2 large scale deployment may be impacted by pressure interaction between CO2 storage operations in the same hydraulic unit. This may impact adversely resources or projects under evaluation or damage the value of existing CO2 storage infrastructures should pressure rise faster than initially planned. Dialogue is required between the industry, the regulators and the academic community to make sure CCS can be deployed optimally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510444
2025-06-02
2026-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BredesenK. [2022] Assessing rock physics and seismic characteristics of the Gassum Formation in the Stenlille aquifer gas storage – A reservoir analog for the Havnsø CO2 storage prospect, Denmark. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control114, February 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103583
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bump, A. and Hovorka, S. [2024] Pressure space: The key subsurface commodity for CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104174
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chatelan, L., Thibeau, S. and Frailey, S. [2023] Application of the Storage Resources Management System to a regional open aquifer using a notional project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103959
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DNV [2024] DNV completes technical update of CCS Directive Guidance Documents to facilitate sustainable CO2 storage in the European Economic Area
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Perform [2021]. Thisted geothermal plant. The geothermal plant at Thisted | geothermperform
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thibeau, S. and Adler, F. [2023a] Pressure-derived storage efficiency for open saline aquifer CO2 storage. Geoenergy Vol 12023. https://doi.org/10.1144/geoenergy2022-003
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thibeau, S. and Adler; F. [2023b] Analytical aquifer methods applied to saline aquifer CO2 storage – far field pressure developments. 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Jun 2023, Volume 2023, p.1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202310594
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, L., Thorsen, R., OttesenS., MeneguoloR., HartvedtK., RingroseP. and NazarianB. [2021] Significance of fault seal in assessing CO2 storage capacity and containment risks – an example from the Horda Platform, northern North Sea. Petroleum Geoscience Vol 27, 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zahid, A., Håland, K., Otterleic, R., Riordan, S., Warchol, M., Princet, S., Tarn-Dyson, G., Simms, A. and Ponten, A [2024] Prediction of Regional Pressure Interactions in CO2 Storage Clusters, Using Material Balance Modelling (November 4, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5069634 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5069634
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou, Q., Birkholzer, J., Tsang, C. and Rutqvist, J [2008] A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formation. IJGGC2 (2008) 626–639
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510444
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510444
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error