1887

Abstract

Summary

After a Proof of Concept in 2022, we presented last year a cloud-native Geoscientific Workflow platform that strictly respects the more recent Energistics (www.energistics.org) and OSDU (www.osduforum.org) publications and the BPMN standard ISO/CEI 19510 to run Direct Acyclic Graph workflows.

With the objective to Facilitate experts’ collaboration to define workflows with an Open-Source interactive “no-code” UI we introduced this year, new capabilities to provide user’s interactions while orchestrating the workflows. This was a strong demand from French Geological Survey (BRGM) and open the way to user’s controlled complex Cyclic Workflows

This drives us to review totally the previous strategy and use the OSDU/EnergyML Activity Template to define human and services tasks and Activity Model Instance for reporting and not to define the design of the workflow.

A new Proof concept: “interactive faulted surface modeling”, applying these principles, was then experimented with the BRGM (French geological survey) on this new base.

This new solution seats on an Event-driven Geoscientific workflow Platform, can be operated from a Web UI including a 3D viewer on which the user can access a set of Geomodelling activity and Sub surface Entities embedded in a reservoir Domain Data Management Service based on RESQML V2.2.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510584
2025-06-02
2026-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Rainaud, J.F. (2005). A Short History of the Last 15 Year's Quest for It Interoperability in the Petroleum E&P Industry. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP, 60(4), 597–605.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PennequinD., DavidPY., ServièreM., AmraouiN., LoiseletC. (2017) Hydro-System Flow Modelling for Water Resources Management in the Fractured and Karstified Chalk Aquifer Environment of Eastern Normandy. In: RenardP., BertrandC. (eds) EuroKarst 2016, Neuchâtel. Advances in Karst Science. Springer, Cham
    [Google Scholar]
  3. NunesP.V., FuruholtV., BurnsN., AursandP. (2020) Vendor-Independent Workflow Architecture to Integrate Domain Applications and Accelerate R&D to Production. First EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition30 November - 3 December 2020, Vienna, Austria
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PiantanidaM., Dalla RosaM., VolpiB., (2020) Geoscience Workflow Tracking by Means of RESQML Standard Format, First EAGE Digitalization Conference and Exhibition, Ext. Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  5. UntereinerL., RainaudJ.F., PerrinM., GauthierV. (2022) A Cloud-Native Standard-based Geoscientific Workflow Architecture for improving geomodelers' collaboration; 83rd EAGE annual conference and exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RainaudJ.F, GauthierV, UntereinerL., PerrinM, ArnouldA., BelhaouariH., LepaireC. (2024); Driving collaboration between OSDU/Energistics Business Activity services by a cloud-native Geoscientific Workflow platform; 85th EAGE annual conference and exhibition, Extended Abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LaurePizzella, NicolasClausolles, Christian BrogaardPedersen, PhilippeCalcagno, MontseColomer, et al.. Geomodelling in Europe: Sharing practices and open-sourcing tools among Geological Surveys. 37th International Geological Congress, Aug 2024, Busan (Corée), South Korea.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510584
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510584
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error