1887

Abstract

Summary

History matching in reservoir engineering aligns model parameters with observed data to improve forecasts by iteratively adjusting parameters like porosity and permeability. Traditional methods, such as ensemble modeling, are computationally expensive for complex reservoirs due to repeated simulations. Machine learning (ML) addresses these challenges by creating surrogate models, like deep neural networks, to predict reservoir outputs and reduce computational demands. However, training such models for ensemble-based history matching remains difficult due to large datasets and generalization issues.

ML can also optimize solver parameters, as seen in simulators like OPM Flow, which use neural networks to manage non-linear stiffness during well events. For example, the Hybrid Newton method improves initial guesses, reducing iterations, while the local hybrid Newton method focuses on near-well regions. However, the latter incurs high offline costs for data generation and training.

We propose a two-step strategy: ensemble-based history matching generates parameter distributions for supervised learning, enabling neural networks to accelerate Newton’s method. The Sample Where It Matters strategy reduces CPU training time. Adapting the local hybrid Newton method for the OPM Flow simulator with simplified black-oil equations, this approach integrates history matching to create nested parameter distributions. Fully connected neural networks and SWIM ensure efficient CPU training.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510615
2025-06-02
2026-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Oliver, D.S. and Chen, Y. [2011] Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Computational Geosciences, 15(1), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-010-9194-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fossum, K., Alyaev, S., and Elsheikh, A.H. [2024] Ensemble history-matching workflow using interpretable SPADE-GAN geomodel. First Break, 42(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2024014.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rasmussen, A.F., Sandve, T.H., Bao, K., Lauser, A., Hove, J., Skaflestad, B., Klöfkorn, R., Blatt, M., Rustad, A.B., Sævareid, O., Lie, K.-A., and Thune, A. [2021] The Open Porous Media Flow reservoir simulator. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 81, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.014.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lechevallier, A., Desroziers, S., Faney, T., Flauraud, E., Nataf, F., and Sandve, H. [2024] Local Hybrid Newton method for the acceleration of well event handling in the simulation of CO2 storage using supervised learning. Working paper or preprint. Available at: https://hal.science/hal-04774181.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolager, E.L., Burak, I., Datar, C., Sun, Q., and Dietrich, F. [2023] Sampling weights of deep neural networks. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16830.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510615
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510615
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error