1887

Abstract

Summary

The study examines the effects of reservoir heterogeneity on microbial and geochemical reactions during underground hydrogen storage (UHS). As renewable energy technologies advance, efficient energy storage solutions are essential. Depleted gas reservoirs offer a promising option for hydrogen storage, but microbial and geochemical reactions induced by hydrogen injection can produce CH4 and H2S, affecting reservoir integrity and hydrogen quality.

Using reactive transport modeling, the research analyses how reservoir heterogeneity, such as variations in porosity and permeability, influences hydrogen distribution and microbial activities. A coupled modeling approach combines a batch model in PHREEQC, focusing on microbial reactions, and fluid flow simulations using MRST. These models consider hydrogen, water, and other components’ interactions in both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems under varying microbial reaction rates. Results indicate that reservoir heterogeneity enhances mixing between hydrogen and in situ gases, increases microbial activity, and reduces hydrogen recovery. In heterogeneous reservoirs, recovery rates were consistently lower, and microbial consumption of hydrogen higher, compared to homogeneous systems.

The findings emphasize the importance of considering reservoir heterogeneity in UHS design and optimization to mitigate risks and improve efficiency. Enhanced interaction surfaces in heterogeneous systems amplify microbial hydrogen loss, underscoring their impact on storage performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510773
2025-06-02
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hanley, E. S., J. P.Deane & B. P. Ó.Gallachóir (2018) The role of hydrogen in low carbon energy futures–A review of existing perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3027–3045.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, S.2017. Chapter 11 - How Cells Grow. In Bioprocess Engineering (Second Edition), ed. S.Liu, 629–697. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Shojaee, A., S.Ghanbari, G.Wang & E.Mackay (2023) Interplay between microbial activity and geochemical reactions during underground hydrogen storage in a seawater-rich formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shojaee, A., S.Ghanbari, G.Wang & E. G.Mackay. 2024a. Integrated Modelling of Bio-Geochemical Aspects in Underground Hydrogen Storage: Implications for Reservoir Selection and Performance. In SPE Europe Energy Conference and Exhibition, D031S020R004.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shojaee, A., S.Kord, R.Miri & O.Mohammadzadeh (2024b) Reactive transport modeling of scale precipitation and deposition during incompatible water injection in carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 14, 515–534.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thiyagarajan, S. R., H.Emadi, A.Hussain, P.Patange & M.Watson (2022) A comprehensive review of the mechanisms and efficiency of underground hydrogen storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 51, 104490.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, G., G.Pickup, K.Sorbie & E.Mackay (2022) Numerical Analysis of Bio-Methanation Process During Underground Hydrogen Storage. 2022, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, G., G. E.Pickup, K. S.Sorbie & E. J.Mackay (2019) Analysis of Compositional Effects on Global Flow Regimes in CO2 Near-Miscible Displacements in Heterogeneous Systems. Transport in Porous Media, 129, 743–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, G., G. E.Pickup, K. S.Sorbie, E. J.Mackay & A.Skauge (2021) Multi-physics approach to modelling near-miscible CO2-WAG process. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 198, 108165.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510773
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510773
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error