1887

Abstract

Summary

Advances in Machine Learning (ML) and embedded systems have enabled the development of smart sensors and autonomous devices capable of both data acquisition and in-situ analysis for time series data (e.g., in acoustic, seismic ). These systems allow continuous monitoring, selectively transmitting or storing only the most relevant information.

This paper focuses on self-supervised learning, particularly contrastive learning with 1D-CNN models, to process in-situ stream datasets under varying labeling constraints. Unlike traditional supervised or unsupervised models, self-supervised learning leverages automatically labeled pretext tasks to extract robust feature representations without manual annotation. We investigate the impact of contrastive learning in two continuous monitoring scenarios using a multimodal dataset from the InSight mission on Mars, featuring seismic and pressure data. The first scenario employs supervised learning for continuous classification, optimized through contrastive pretraining with multiple data augmentation methods. The second scenario, based on one-class classifiers, detects unexpected events using strong features extracted via contrastive learning. While illustrated with Mars data, these approaches are applicable to other continuous monitoring contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510917
2025-06-02
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. M.Golombeket al. “Geology of the InSight Landing Site on Mars”. In: Nature Communications11.1 (Feb. 2020), p. 1014.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. TingChenet al. “A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations”. In: Proc. of the 37th Int. Conf, on Machine Learning. Vol. 119. July 2020, pp. 1597–1607.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MichaelGutmannet al. “Noise-Contrastive Estimation of Unnormalized Statistical Models with Applications to Natural Image Statistics”. In: J. of Machine Learning Research13.1, pp. 307–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JohannesPoppelbaumet al. “Contrastive Learning “Based Self-Supervised Time-Series Analysis”. In: Applied Soft Computing117 (Mar. 2022), p. 108397.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RomainBaillyet al. (2024). “Detecting abnormal cell behaviors from dry mass time series”. In: Scientific Reports, 14(1), 7053. 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RomainBaillyet al. “Deep Anomaly Detection Using Self-Supervised Learning: Application to Time Series of Cellular Data”. In: ASPAI 2021. Nov. 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BernhardScholkopfet al. “Support Vector Method for “Novelty Detection”. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 12. MIT Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CorinnaCorteset al. “Support-Vector Networks”. In: Machine Learning20.3 (Sept. 1995), pp. 273–297. ISSN: 1573–0565. DOI: 10.1007/BF00994018. (Visited on 08/18/2023).
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018 [Google Scholar]
  9. Markus M.Breuniget al. “LOF: Identifying DensityBased Local Outliers”. In: ACM SIGMOD Record29.2 (May 2000), pp. 93–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fei TonyLiuet al. “Isolation Forest”. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining. Dec. 2008, pp. 413–422.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510917
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202510917
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error