Noise Removal using Vertical Continuation Filters: Application to Archaeogeophysical Data

References

1. Ai, H., Alvandi, A., Ghanati, R., Pham, L.T., Alarifi, S.S., Nasui, D. and Eldosouky, A.M. [2023] Modified non-local means: A novel denoising approach to process gravity field data. Open Geosciences, 15(1), 20220551.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ai, H., Deniz Toktay, H., Alvandi, A., Pašteka, R., Su, K. and Liu, Q. [2024] Advancing potential field data analysis: the Modified Horizontal Gradient Amplitude method (MHGA). Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 54(2), 119–143.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baniamerian, J., Liu, S. and Abbas, M.A. [2018] Stable computation of the vertical gradient of potential field data based on incorporating the smoothing filters. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175(8), 2785–2806.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blakely, R.J. [1996] Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davis, K., Li, Y. and Nabighian, M.N. [2011] Effects of low-pass filtering on the calculated structural index from magnetic data. Geophysics, 76(4), L23–L28.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Felcanová, Z., Felcan, M. and Lieskovský, T. [2021] The Archaeology of the Invisible: Cases of Non-Destructive Research in Archaeology (in Slovak). Chronos.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jacobsen, B.H. [1987] A case for upward continuation as a standard separation filter for potential-field maps. Geophysics, 52(8), 1138–1148.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ku, C.C., Telford, W.M. and Lim, S.H. [1971] The use of linear filtering in gravity problems. Geophysics, 36(6), 1174–1203.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Oliveira, S.P, Bongiolo, A.B.S., Pham, L.T., De Castro, L.G. and Jorge, V.T. [2023] On the practical implementation of the enhanced horizontal derivative filter for potential field data. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 53(4), 319–331.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Oliveira, S.P. and Pham, L.T [2022] A stable finite difference method based on upward continuation to evaluate vertical derivatives of potential field data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(12), 4555–4566.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pašteka, R., Richter, F.P, Karcol, R., Brazda, K. and Hajach, M. [2009] Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57(4), 507–516.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Peters, L.J. [1949] The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application. Geophysics, 14(3), 290–320.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Prutkin, I., Vajda, P. and Gottsmann, J. [2014] The gravimetric picture of magmatic and hydrothermal sources driving hybrid unrest on Tenerife in 2004/5. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 282, 9–18.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Spector, A. and Grant, F.S. [1970] Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics, 35(2), 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tran, K.V. and Nguyen, T.N. [2020] A novel method for computing the vertical gradients of the potential field: application to downward continuation. Geophysical Journal International, 220(2), 1316–1329.
    [Google Scholar]