1887

Abstract

Summary

Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a popular geophysical technique for characterizing subsurface resistivity distributions. However, ERT inversion is an inherently ill-posed problem and traditional deterministic inversion techniques are prone to local minima and strongly depend on the initialization. Moreover, they are not able to quantify uncertainty, crucial for decision-making in applied geophysics. In this study, we present a computationally efficient Bayesian framework for ERT inversion, based on Annealed Stein Variational Gradient Descent (A-SVGD) and a Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) reparameterization of the model space. This approach enables uncertainty quantification while reducing the dimensionality of the inverse problem, thus maintaining tractable computational costs. We apply our method to a real dipole-dipole ERT dataset and compare the results with those from a classical deterministic inversion. Our approach yields a significantly lower data misfit and produces a resistivity model consistent with the deterministic solution. Moreover, the final particle ensemble allows quantification of model uncertainty. The DCT compression is crucial to maintain affordable computational costs, at the expense of a slightly lower model resolution. Our results highlight the potential of A-SVGD combined with DCT compression as a powerful alternative to conventional inversion techniques, also able to provide accurate uncertainty quantification maintaining computational efficiency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520034
2025-09-07
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aleardi, M. [2020] Discrete cosine transform for parameter space reduction in linear and non-linear AVA inversions. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 179, 104106.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleardi, M., Vinciguerra, A., Stucchi, E. and Hojat, A. [2022] Machine learning-accelerated gradient-based Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion applied to electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics, 20: 440–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berti, S., Aleardi, M. and Stucchi, E. [2024] A probabilistic full waveform inversion of surface waves. Geophysical Prospecting, 72(9), pp. 3448–3473.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Corrales, M., Berti, S., Denel, B., Williamson, P., Aleardi, M. and Ravasi, M. [2025] Annealed stein variational gradient descent for improved uncertainty estimation in full-waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, Volume 241, Issue 2, pages 1088–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. D'Angelo, F. and Fortuin, V. [2020] Annealed Stein Variational Gradient Descent. 3rd Symposium on Advanced in Approximate Bayesian Inference, 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., and Singer, Y. [2011] Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(7), 2121–2159.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramirez, A. L., Nitao, J.J., Hanley, W.G., Aines, R., Glaser, R.E., Sengupta, S.K., Dyer, K.M., Hickling, T.L. and Daily, W.D. [2005] Stochastic inversion of electrical resistivity changes using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach, Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, B02101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Richardson, A. [2018] Seismic Full-Waveform inversion using Deep Learning tools and techniques. arXiv:1801.07232.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rücker, C., Günther, T. and Wagner, F.M. [2017] pyGIMLi: An open-source library for modelling and inversion in geophysics. Computers and Geosciences, 109, 106–123.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520034
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520034
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error