1887

Abstract

Summary

This study demonstrates the value of integrating Transient Electromagnetic (TEM) and Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) methods to characterize groundwater systems in data-sparse regions of Sub-Saharan Africa. Traditional hydrogeological assessments relying on boreholes are limited due to high costs and sparse spatial resolution. TEM provides high-resolution resistivity data, revealing the lateral and vertical extent of subsurface units, while NMR directly quantifies water content and the pore environment.

Two case studies highlight this combined approach: a coastal aquifer in Senegal and a river system near Kakuma, Kenya. In Senegal, the data revealed a stratified aquifer system with a fresh upper unit overlying a deeper saline body, enabling assessment of potential vulnerability to saltwater intrusion. In Kenya, the methods identified saturated sand channel deposits within a clay-dominated floodplain, suitable for managed aquifer recharge and water extraction.

By combining the resistivity sensitivity of TEM with the direct water content measurements of NMR, ambiguous interpretations—such as distinguishing between saline sands and clays—can be resolved. This integrated approach offers a non-invasive, scalable solution for hydrogeological mapping in remote or logistically constrained regions, supporting more informed groundwater resource management and planning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520039
2025-09-07
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auken, E., Foged, N., Larsen, J.J., Lassen, K.V.T., Maurya, P.K., Dath, S.M. and Eiskjær, T.T., 2019. tTEM—A towed transient electromagnetic system for detailed 3D imaging of the top 70 m of the subsurface. Geophysics, 84(1), pp.E13–E22.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Christiansen, A.V., Auken, E. and Sørensen, K., 2006. The transient electromagnetic method. In Groundwater geophysics: A tool for hydrogeology (pp. 179–225). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grombacher, D., Liu, L., Griffiths, M.P., Vang, M.Ø. and Larsen, J.J., 2021. Steady‐state surface NMR for mapping of groundwater. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(23), p.e2021GL095381.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Larsen, J.J., Liu, L., Grombacher, D., Osterman, G and Auken, E., 2020. Apsu—A new compact surface nuclear magnetic resonance system for groundwater investigation. Geophysics, 85(2), pp.JM1–JM11.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Legchenko, A., Baltassat, J.M., Beauce, A. and Bernard, J., 2002. Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 50(1–2), pp.21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Legchenko, A., Ezersky, M., Camerlynck, C, Al-Zoubi, A. and Chalikakis, K., 2009. Joint use of TEM and MRS methods in a complex geological setting. Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, 341(10–11), pp.908–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sørensen, K.I. and Auken, E., 2004. SkyTEM-A new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics, 35(3), pp.191–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yaramanci, U., Lange, G. and Knödel, K, 1999. Surface NMR within a geophysical study of an aquifer at Haldensleben (Germany) [Link]. Geophysical prospecting, 47(6), pp.923–943.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520039
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error