1887

Abstract

Summary

This study presents a feasibility assessment of 4D seismic monitoring offshore Pohang, South Korea, using Ocean Bottom Cables (OBC). A small-scale survey was conducted with a single OBC and sparse shot line spacing, resulting in relatively high initial NRMS values compared to international benchmarks. Environmental factors such as tide variations, ambient noise, and near-surface heterogeneities also contributed to baseline noise. To address these challenges, advanced 4D data processing workflows were applied, including receiver position refinement using the DER method, trace rotation, PZ summation, and noise suppression. As a result, NRMS values were significantly reduced by up to 10% through trace match filtering, and further improvements were achieved with additional residual noise suppression. The study validates the feasibility of reliable 4D seismic monitoring offshore Korea and establishes a realistic baseline for future CCS projects. It highlights the necessity for optimized acquisition strategies and advanced processing techniques to enhance repeatability. The results support the future application of 4D monitoring at domestic geological storage candidate sites for CCS.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520071
2025-09-07
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chadwick, A., Williams, G., Delepine, N., Clochard, V., Labat, K., Sturton, S., Buddensiek, M.-L., Dillen, M., Nickel, M., Lima, A. L., Arts, R., Neele, F., and Rossi, G., 2010, Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO2 storage operation: The Leading Edge, 29(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3304820
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Singh, A. P., Maurya, S. P., Kant, R., Singh, K. H., Singh, R., Srivastava, M. K., Hema, G., and Verma, N., 2025, Implementing 4D seismic inversion based on Linear Programming techniques for CO2 monitoring at the Sleipner field CCS site in the North Sea, Norway: Acta Geophysica, 73, 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01376-6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Roach, L. A. N., White, D. J., Roberts, B., and Angus, D., 2017, Initial 4D seismic results after CO2 injection start-up at the Aquistore storage site: Geophysics, 82(3), B95–B107. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0434.1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. UNFCCC, 2023, Draft decision -/CP.28: Recognizing the role of CCUS as a low-emission technology under the Paris Agreement. 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/documents
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim, D., Joo, Y., and Byun, J., 2023, First-break picking method based on the difference between multiwindow energy ratios: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3255261
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520071
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520071
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error