Dynamic Optimized Experimental Design Strategies for Geoelectrical Monitoring of Subsurface Flow Processes

References

1. Loke, M.H., Wilkinson, P.B. and Chambers, J.E. [2010] Parallel computation of optimized arrays for 2-D electrical imaging surveys. Geophysical Journal International, 183(3), 1302–1315.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Maurer, H. and Boerner, D.E. [1998] Optimized design of geophysical experiments. The Leading Edge, 17(8), 1119–1119.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Stummer, P., Maurer, H. and Green, A.G. [2004] Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. GEOPHYSICS, 69(1), 120–139.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Wagner, F.M., Gunther, T., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C. and Maurer, H. [2015] Constructive optimization of electrode locations for target-focused resistivity monitoring. GEOPHYSICS, 80(2), E29–E40.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Wang, H., Lin, C.P., Mok, T.H., Wu, P.L. and Liu, H.C. [2022] High-fidelity subsurface resistivity imaging incorporating borehole measurements for monitoring underground construction. Engineering Geology, 299, 106558.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Wilkinson, P.B., Meldrum, P.I., Chambers, J.E., Kuras, O. and Ogilvy, R.D. [2006] Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations. Geophysical Journal International, 167(3), 1119–1126.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Wilkinson, P.B., Uhlemann, S., Meldrum, P.I., Chambers, J.E., Carrière, S., Oxby, L.S. and Loke, M.H. [2015] Adaptive time-lapse optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography monitoring. Geophysical Journal International, 203(1), 755–766.
   [Google Scholar]