1887

Abstract

Summary

Effective aquifer management depends on predictive models calibrated with diverse data sources. Surface deformation measurements from Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) provide valuable insights into subsurface hydraulic properties by leveraging the poroelastic coupling between fluid flow and ground deformation. However, most Bayesian frameworks assume isotropic priors, limiting their capacity to represent complex anisotropic behavior in real aquifers. To address this, we introduce a Bayesian model for anisotropic hydraulic conductivity based on a Lie group framework for constructing symmetric positive definite (SPD) tensors. The hydraulic conductivity tensor is represented via spectral decomposition, separating uncertainties in magnitude and orientation. Directional uncertainty is modeled using a Bayesian mixture of von Mises distributions, calibrated against fracture outcrop data. We apply this approach to the Anderson Junction aquifer in Utah, a site characterized by strong anisotropy. Two modeling scenarios are explored: one incorporating pumping test data, and another relying solely on geological observations. Forward uncertainty propagation reveals that directional uncertainty significantly influences predicted InSAR line-of-sight (LOS) displacements. Our results highlight the importance of incorporating stochastic anisotropy for robust and flexible characterization of aquifer systems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520124
2025-09-07
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alghamdi, A., Hesse, M.A., Chen, J. and Ghattas, O. [2020] Bayesian Poroelastic Aquifer Characterization From InSAR Surface Deformation Data. Part I: Maximum A Posteriori Estimate. Water Resources Research, 56(10), e2020WR027391.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghamdi, A., Hesse, M.A., Chen, J., Villa, U. and Ghattas, O. [2021] Bayesian Poroelastic Aquifer Characterization From InSAR Surface Deformation Data. 2. Quantifying the Uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 57(11), e2021WR029775.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Heilweil, V.M. and Hsieh, P.A. [2006] Determining Anisotropic Transmissivity Using a Simplified Papadopulos Method. Groundwater, 44(5), 749–753.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lark, R., Clifford, D. and Waters, C. [2014] Modelling complex geological circular data with the projected normal distribution and mixtures of von Mises distributions. Solid Earth, 5(2), 631–639.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Salehian Ghamsari, S., Van Dam, T. and Hale, J.S. [2025] Can the anisotropic hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer be determined using surface displacement data? A case study. Applied Computing and Geosciences. Accepted, in press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shivanand, S.K., Rosić, B. and Matthies, H.G. [2024] Stochastic modelling of symmetric positive definite material tensors. Journal of Computational Physics, 505, 112883.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Taghia, J., Ma, Z. and Leijon, A. [2014] Bayesian Estimation of the von-Mises Fisher Mixture Model with Variational Inference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(9), 1701–1715.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520124
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520124
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error