1887

Abstract

Summary

Subsurface cavity detection in urban environments poses significant challenges due to restricted access, complex stratigraphy, and anthropogenic noise. This study presents an integrated 3D geophysical approach applied in the historical center of Agrigento (Italy), aimed at identifying potential underground voids beneath narrow streets and densely built areas. A combined acquisition of Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) and Seismic Refraction Tomography (SRT) was conducted using a C-shaped sensor layout tailored for confined urban settings. Both datasets were independently inverted and subsequently integrated using a non-hierarchical k-means cluster analysis within a voxel-based domain. The clustering technique, originally developed for 2D data, was extended to 3D tomographic volumes, allowing for enhanced detection of anomalous zones based on the spatial correlation of high resistivity and low seismic velocity. The results revealed three main anomalous volumes interpreted as potential cavities, with the most prominent located at shallow depth near the intersection of Via Alletto and Vicolo Cobaitari. This methodology proved effective in overcoming typical limitations of urban surveys, providing a replicable strategy for high-resolution, non-invasive subsurface diagnostics. The findings contribute to urban geohazard assessment and offer valuable support for planning and risk mitigation in areas with known or suspected subsurface instability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520132
2025-09-07
2026-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Carollo, A., Capizzi, P., and Martorana, R. [2020] Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 178, 104069 ISSN 0926-9851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104069
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D. [1996] Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MartoranaR., CapizziP., and PirreraC. [2023] Unconventional arrays for 3D Electrical Resistivity and Induced Polarization Tomography to detect leachate concentration in a waste landfill. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 7203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127203
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tarantola, A. [2005] Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 342 p. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717921
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tejero-Andrade, A., Cifuentes, G., Chávez, R.E., López-González, A.E., Delgado-Solórzano, C. [2015] L-and CORNER-arrays for 3D electric resistivity tomography: An alternative for geophysical surveys in urban zones. Near Surface Geophysics13, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2015015
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, B., and Greenhalgh, S.A. [2000] Crosshole seismic tomography using wavefront tracking and wavepath technique. Geophysical Journal International, 141(2), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/2/2/008
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520132
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520132
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error