1887

Abstract

Summary

This study evaluates the efficiency of incorporating spatial information into the clustering of Frequency Domain ElectroMagnetic (FDEM) data for archaeological interpretation. Building on previous work that applied K-Means clustering to two-dimensional space defined by the in-phase and quadrature components of the electromagnetic field, this research tests a four-dimensional clustering approach by adding geographic coordinates to the properties set. The goal is to assess whether including spatial information improves the identification of areas of archaeological interest. FDEM data from the Torre Galli site in Calabria, Italy, were analyzed using both 2D (EM components only) and 4D (EM components plus spatial coordinates) clustering, with cluster validity assessed through Silhouette analysis. Results indicate that the 2D clustering approach yields more distinct and archaeologically meaningful clusters, showing better alignment with excavation-validated features compared to 4D approach. The inclusion of spatial coordinates in the clustering process seems distorting the cluster geometry. This reduces the discrimination power of electromagnetic features, leading to a less clear differentiation between natural background and archaeological target areas including roads, walls and metal artifacts. These findings suggest that, for FDEM data interpretation in archaeology, focusing on the intrinsic electromagnetic properties without spatial embedding enhances the accuracy and efficiency of anomaly detection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520151
2025-09-07
2026-02-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BoschiF (2020) Archeologia senza scavo. Geofisica e indagini non invasive. Bononia Univer., Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CapozzoliA, PaolettiV, CellaF, LaManna M, PiegariE (2025) Integrated electromagnetic mapping through K-Means to improve identification of areas of archaeological interest. Archaeol. Prospect, accepted.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CellaF, FediM (2015) High-resolution geophysical 3D imaging for archaeology by magnetic and EM data: the case of the iron age settlement of Torre Galli, Southern Italy. Surv. Geophys. 36: 831–850.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GramignaP, GuidoA, MastandreaA, RussoF (2008) The paleontological site of Cessaniti: a window on a coastal marine environment of seven million years ago (southern Calabria, Italy). Geol. Rom. 41: 25–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MurphyK P (2012) Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PaolettiV, LaManna M, CapozzoliA, MercurioM, ZinniM, NasoA (2024) GPR survey at the Etruscan necropolis of Sasso Pinzuto, Tuscania (Central Italy). J Archaeol Sci Rep60: 104833.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TabbaghA (1986) Applications and advantages of the Slingram electromagnetic method for archaeological prospecting. Geophys51: 576–584.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520151
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520151
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error