1887

Abstract

Summary

Joint inversion of geophysical data leverages complementary sensitivities to improve subsurface imaging. In this study, we present a cross-gradient regularized joint inversion framework that combines full waveform inversion (FWI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) using automatic differentiation. FWI is sensitive to elastic properties, while ERT resolves electrical resistivity variations, often linked to fluid content and lithology. Independently, each method faces limitations related to non-uniqueness and resolution. By structurally coupling them via the cross-gradient constraint—which promotes co-located spatial gradients—we enhance the geological consistency of the recovered models without requiring explicit petrophysical relationships. Both FWI and ERT forward solvers are implemented in PyTorch: FWI uses Deepwave for differentiable elastic wave propagation, and ERT is adapted from SimPEG as a differentiable Poisson solver. The entire inversion is expressed as a unified computational graph, enabling efficient gradient computation and optimization via L-BFGS. A synthetic example demonstrates that joint inversion improves feature recovery compared to individual inversions, particularly in regions where one modality alone lacks sensitivity. This flexible, autodiff-based approach offers a practical pathway for integrating multiple geophysical methods in structurally constrained inversion frameworks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520159
2025-09-07
2026-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baydin, A.G., Pearlmutter, B.A., Radul, A.A. and Siskind, J.M., 2018. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of machine learning research, 18(153), pp.1–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockett, R., Kang, S., Heagy, L.J., Pidlisecky, A. and Oldenburg, D.W., 2015. SimPEG: An open source framework for simulation and gradient based parameter estimation in geophysical applications. Computers & Geosciences, 85, pp. 142–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallardo, L.A. and Meju, M.A., 2004. Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B3).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Paszke, A., 2019. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01703.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Richardson, A.2022. Deepwave. Available at: https://ausargeo.com/deepwave/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rincon, F., Monsalve, G. and Uhlemann, S., 2020, December. DC resistivity and seismic refraction define surface ruptures in tropical soils-A case study of La Bonita, Antioquia, Colombia. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 2020, pp. NS004–04).
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520159
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.202520159
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error